I did tag 1.1.13, but as it happened right before a vacation I think I may have forgotten to announce it :-)
> On 23 Jun 2015, at 2:18 pm, Keisuke MORI <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2015-06-22 23:12 GMT+09:00 Ken Gaillot <[email protected]>: >> On 06/21/2015 10:17 PM, Digimer wrote: >>> On 21/06/15 11:14 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>>> Yet again I’ve been pulled into the world of OpenStack. >>>> >>>> The bad news is that I’ve not been able to give any attention to >>>> finalising the 1.1.13 release. >>>> The good news is that a tonne of work has been going into the master >>>> branch for Pacemaker and Pacemaker Remote. >>>> >>>> I now have the task of getting that code stable for release in RHEL. >>>> >>>> Looking at the release branch, there have only been 4 patches since the >>>> last RC: >>>> >>>> + cib: Correctly add "update-origin", "update-client" and "update-user" >>>> attributes for cib >>>> + pengine: cl#5130 - Only check the capacities of the nodes that are >>>> allowed to run the resource >>>> + xml: Correctly create v1 patchsets when deleting attributes >>>> + xml: Prevent potential use-of-NULL >>>> >>>> So it seems to be in pretty good shape. >>>> >>>> >>>> I see 2 main options at this point: >>>> >>>> 1. Tag what we have as 1.1.13 and start on a 1.1.14 release >>>> 2. Restart the release 1.1.13 process with what is in master >>>> >>>> What would people prefer to happen? >>> >>> Might as well tag 1.1.13 and start on 1.1.14. Releases mark stable >>> points in time, basically, and it sounds stable right now. >> >> Agreed, people are getting accustomed to faster release cycles these >> days, so getting 1.1.13 out the door now and 1.1.14 around the end of >> the year would be great (or even earlier if features and fixes justify it). > > I would +1 for this, too. > > Our team has been trying to test 1.1.13-rc* these days and I would > also consider that it is sufficiently stable and ready to use. > It has been almost a year since 1.1.12 was released and I want a new toy:) > > Thanks, > -- > Keisuke MORI > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: [email protected] > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
