On 06/08/15 15:42 +0900, [email protected] wrote: > We have a question for the next correction. > * > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/a97c28d75347aa7be76092aa22459f0f56a220ff > > We understand it that this obeyed a correction of systemd. > > > In Pacemaker1.1.13, "SysVStartPriority=99" is set. > Pacemaker1.1.12 is set, too. > > > When we use Pacemaker1.1.12, does it have a problem to delete > "SysVStartPriority=99"? > Or must we not delete it when use Pacemaker1.1.12 and Pacemaker1.1.13? > Or is it necessary to judge it by a version of systemd of the OS, and to set > it?
It was a leftover from times systemd took that value into account (definitely not the case with systemd-218+), and yes, systemd version is the only deciding factor whether it makes sense to state the parameter in the unit file. I wouldn't expect this change will cause any issue regardless since the order at the startup/shutdown is pretty clear anyway (After/Requires). So if you want, just go for it (and let us know in case of troubles). After all, unit files are there to be tweaked by keen sysadmins like you via overrides in /etc/systemd/user :-) -- Jan (Poki)
pgplSAoDUQBVd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
