On 29/08/15 02:51 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote: > On 08/29/2015 02:37 PM, Digimer wrote: >> No need for clustered LVM, only the active node should see the PV. When >> the passive takes over, after connecting to the PV, it should do a >> pvscan -> vgscan -> lvscan before mounting the FS on the LV. >> >> Keep you cluster simple; remove everything not needed. > > Hi Digimer, > > It would be great if my cluster could communicate with the storage-array > to make it "present" or "unpresent" LUNs based on the cluster conditions > but I'm afraid that's not possible :) So yes, these are LUNs that are > visible on both nodes. > > I'm the one who asked you something regarding cLVM on IRC the other day > (one of the many times you have helped me there) and I decided to go the > cLVM/DLM route (because the LUNs are seen on both nodes) but now I have > my issues with this VG activation. > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Jorge
Ah, OK then. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org