On 09/07/2015 02:20 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: > If a node configured to use SBD can't read the disk, it can't do SBD. To be > safe, the node must shut down.
Hi, Yes but if cluster communications are still going on I find it harsh to self-fence. I get what you mean but at least I think this should be up to the administrator; a configurable parameter (and that's what they've done in SUSE with the -P option). > However you can have redundant SBD disks; did you know? Yes, I read about that one but I believe that if my SBD disk fails , the rest might fail as well since they all come from the same SAN & same storage-array. What I'm debating in my head is whether to use a small partition within one of the production LUNs (LUNs shared with the other node for application data) or if I should request a separate small LUN just for SBD. Thanks, Jorge _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
