>> Nov 06 01:30:54 corosync [TOTEM ] Retransmit List: 96 97 >> Nov 06 01:30:56 corosync [TOTEM ] Retransmit List: 96 97 >> Nov 06 01:30:57 corosync [TOTEM ] Retransmit List: 96 97 >> Nov 06 01:30:59 corosync [TOTEM ] Retransmit List: 96 97 >> Nov 06 01:31:01 corosync [TOTEM ] Retransmit List: 96 97 > > This means something is blocking successful delivery of packets. Make sure to: > - Properly configure firewall (for testing you can disable it completely) > - Make sure you have properly configured multicast. As alternative, you can > try udpu. Udpu is usually better compatible with switches and for two node > use case performance is same. Thanks, though got no FW between VM nodes, and multicast should be working too:
[root@afnA ~]# iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination [root@afnA ~]# omping afnB afnA afnB : waiting for response msg afnB : joined (S,G) = (*, 232.43.211.234), pinging afnB : unicast, seq=1, size=69 bytes, dist=0, time=0.265ms afnB : unicast, seq=2, size=69 bytes, dist=0, time=0.342ms afnB : multicast, seq=2, size=69 bytes, dist=0, time=0.443ms afnB : unicast, seq=3, size=69 bytes, dist=0, time=0.517ms afnB : multicast, seq=3, size=69 bytes, dist=0, time=0.590ms afnB : unicast, seq=4, size=69 bytes, dist=0, time=0.349ms afnB : multicast, seq=4, size=69 bytes, dist=0, time=0.435ms afnB : unicast, seq=5, size=69 bytes, dist=0, time=0.361ms afnB : multicast, seq=5, size=69 bytes, dist=0, time=0.448ms afnB : unicast, seq=6, size=69 bytes, dist=0, time=0.277ms afnB : multicast, seq=6, size=69 bytes, dist=0, time=0.343ms afnB : unicast, seq=7, size=69 bytes, dist=0, time=0.302ms afnB : multicast, seq=7, size=69 bytes, dist=0, time=0.402ms ^C afnB : unicast, xmt/rcv/%loss = 7/7/0%, min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.265/0.345/0.517/0.084 afnB : multicast, xmt/rcv/%loss = 7/6/14% (seq>=2 0%), min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.343/0.444/0.590/0.082 [root@afnA ~]# also corosync should be okay ImHO: [root@afnA ~]# corosync-quorumtool -l Nodeid Name 1 afnA.mxi.tdcfoo 2 afnB.mxi.tdcfoo [root@afnA ~]# corosync-quorumtool -s Version: 1.4.7 Nodes: 2 Ring ID: 208 Quorum type: quorum_cman Quorate: Yes [root@afnA ~]# pcs status Cluster name: afn-cluster Last updated: Fri Nov 6 08:57:57 2015 Last change: Fri Nov 6 02:47:33 2015 Stack: cman Current DC: afna - partition with quorum Version: 1.1.11-97629de 2 Nodes configured 0 Resources configured Online: [ afna ] OFFLINE: [ afnb ] Full list of resources: [root@afnA ~]#
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
