> On 6 Oct 2015, at 9:39 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Dell - Internal Use - Confidential > > Hello Pacemaker Admins, > > We have a query regarding licensing for pacemaker header files > > As per the given link http://clusterlabs.org/wiki/License, it is mentioned > that “Pacemaker programs are licensed under the GPLv2+ (version 2 or later of > the GPL) and its headers and libraries are under the less restrictive LGPLv2+ > (version 2 or later of the LGPL) .” > > However, website link > http://clusterlabs.org/doxygen/pacemaker/2927a0f9f25610c331b6a137c846fec27032c9ea/cib_8h.html, > states otherwise. > Cib.h header file needed to be included in order to configure pacemaker using > C API. But the header file for cib.h states that the header file is under GPL > license > This seems to be conflicting the statement regarding header file license. > > In addition, which similar issue has been discussed in the past > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/75967, no additional > details on the resolution.
I thought that was a pretty clear statement, but you’re correct that the licences were not changed. Does this satisfy? https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/6de9fde > > Need your inputs on licensing to proceed further. > > Thanks & Regards > Santosh Bidaralli > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: [email protected] > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
