Thank you, Ken Gaillot, for your response. Sorry for the delayed followup, but 
I have looked and looked at the scripts. There are a couple of scripts that 
have a pcs resource ban command, but they are not executed at the time of 
shutdown which is when I've discovered that the constraint is put back in. Our 
application software did not change on the system. We just updated pcs and 
pacemaker (and dependencies). I had to rollback pcs because it has an issue. 

Below is from /var/log/cluster/corosync.log. Any clues here as to why the 
constraint might have been added? In my other system without the pacemaker 
update, there is not the addition of the constraint. 

Feb 19 15:22:23 [1999] g5se-f3efce       crmd:     info: do_state_transition:   
State transition S_POLICY_ENGINE -> S_TRANSITION_ENGINE [ input=I_PE_SUCCESS 
cause=C_IPC_MESSAGE origin=handle_response ]
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1999] g5se-f3efce       crmd:     info: do_te_invoke:  
Processing graph 9 (ref=pe_calc-dc-1455920543-46) derived from 
/var/lib/pacemaker/pengine/pe-input-642.bz2
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1999] g5se-f3efce       crmd:   notice: run_graph:     
Transition 9 (Complete=0, Pending=0, Fired=0, Skipped=0, Incomplete=0, 
Source=/var/lib/pacemaker/pengine/pe-input-642.bz2): Complete
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1999] g5se-f3efce       crmd:     info: do_log:        FSA: 
Input I_TE_SUCCESS from notify_crmd() received in state S_TRANSITION_ENGINE
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1999] g5se-f3efce       crmd:   notice: do_state_transition:   
State transition S_TRANSITION_ENGINE -> S_IDLE [ input=I_TE_SUCCESS 
cause=C_FSA_INTERNAL origin=notify_crmd ]
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1998] g5se-f3efce    pengine:   notice: process_pe_message:    
Calculated Transition 9: /var/lib/pacemaker/pengine/pe-input-642.bz2
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1994] g5se-f3efce        cib:     info: cib_process_request:   
Forwarding cib_modify operation for section constraints to master 
(origin=local/crm_resource/3)
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1994] g5se-f3efce        cib:     info: cib_perform_op:        
Diff: --- 0.291.8 2
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1994] g5se-f3efce        cib:     info: cib_perform_op:        
Diff: +++ 0.292.0 (null)
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1994] g5se-f3efce        cib:     info: cib_perform_op:        
+  /cib:  @epoch=292, @num_updates=0
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1994] g5se-f3efce        cib:     info: cib_perform_op:        
++ /cib/configuration/constraints:  <rsc_location 
id="cli-ban-ClusterIP-on-g5se-f3efce" rsc="ClusterIP" role="Started" 
node="g5se-f3efce" score="-INFINITY"/>
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1994] g5se-f3efce        cib:     info: cib_process_request:   
Completed cib_modify operation for section constraints: OK (rc=0, 
origin=g5se-f3efce/crm_resource/3, version=0.292.0)
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1999] g5se-f3efce       crmd:     info: 
abort_transition_graph:        Transition aborted by 
rsc_location.cli-ban-ClusterIP-on-g5se-f3efce 'create': Non-status change 
(cib=0.292.0, source=te_update_diff:383, path=/cib/configuration/constraints, 1)
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1999] g5se-f3efce       crmd:   notice: do_state_transition:   
State transition S_IDLE -> S_POLICY_ENGINE [ input=I_PE_CALC 
cause=C_FSA_INTERNAL origin=abort_transition_graph ]
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1998] g5se-f3efce    pengine:   notice: update_validation:     
pacemaker-1.2-style configuration is also valid for pacemaker-1.3
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1998] g5se-f3efce    pengine:     info: update_validation:     
Transformation upgrade-1.3.xsl successful
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1998] g5se-f3efce    pengine:     info: update_validation:     
Transformed the configuration from pacemaker-1.2 to pacemaker-2.0
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1998] g5se-f3efce    pengine:     info: cli_config_update:     
Your configuration was internally updated to the latest version (pacemaker-2.0)
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1998] g5se-f3efce    pengine:   notice: unpack_config:         
On loss of CCM Quorum: Ignore
Feb 19 15:22:23 [1998] g5se-f3efce    pengine:     info: unpack_status:         
Node g5se-f3efce is in standby-mode

I'm not sure what all has to be included my original email and Ken Gaillot's 
response embedded in it below. 

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:37:31 -0600
From: Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com>
To: users@clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] ClusterIP location constraint reappears
        after reboot
Message-ID: <56c61d7b.9090...@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

On 02/18/2016 01:07 PM, Jeremy Matthews wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We're having an issue with our cluster where after a reboot of our system a 
> location constraint reappears for the ClusterIP. This causes a problem, 
> because we have a daemon that checks the cluster state and waits until the 
> ClusterIP is started before it kicks off our application. We didn't have this 
> issue when using an earlier version of pacemaker. Here is the constraint as 
> shown by pcs:
> 
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs constraint Location Constraints:
>   Resource: ClusterIP
>     Disabled on: g5se-f3efce (role: Started) Ordering Constraints:
> Colocation Constraints:
> 
> ...and here is our cluster status with the ClusterIP being Stopped:
> 
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs status
> Cluster name: cl-g5se-f3efce
> Last updated: Thu Feb 18 11:36:01 2016 Last change: Thu Feb 18 
> 10:48:33 2016 via crm_resource on g5se-f3efce
> Stack: cman
> Current DC: g5se-f3efce - partition with quorum
> Version: 1.1.11-97629de
> 1 Nodes configured
> 4 Resources configured
> 
> 
> Online: [ g5se-f3efce ]
> 
> Full list of resources:
> 
> sw-ready-g5se-f3efce   (ocf::pacemaker:GBmon): Started g5se-f3efce
> meta-data      (ocf::pacemaker:GBmon): Started g5se-f3efce
> netmon (ocf::heartbeat:ethmonitor):    Started g5se-f3efce
> ClusterIP      (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):       Stopped
> 
> 
> The cluster really just has one node at this time.
> 
> I retrieve the constraint ID, remove the constraint, verify that ClusterIP is 
> started,  and then reboot:
> 
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs constraint ref ClusterIP
> Resource: ClusterIP
>   cli-ban-ClusterIP-on-g5se-f3efce
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs constraint remove 
> cli-ban-ClusterIP-on-g5se-f3efce
> 
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs status
> Cluster name: cl-g5se-f3efce
> Last updated: Thu Feb 18 11:45:09 2016 Last change: Thu Feb 18 
> 11:44:53 2016 via crm_resource on g5se-f3efce
> Stack: cman
> Current DC: g5se-f3efce - partition with quorum
> Version: 1.1.11-97629de
> 1 Nodes configured
> 4 Resources configured
> 
> 
> Online: [ g5se-f3efce ]
> 
> Full list of resources:
> 
> sw-ready-g5se-f3efce   (ocf::pacemaker:GBmon): Started g5se-f3efce
> meta-data      (ocf::pacemaker:GBmon): Started g5se-f3efce
> netmon (ocf::heartbeat:ethmonitor):    Started g5se-f3efce
> ClusterIP      (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):       Started g5se-f3efce
> 
> 
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# reboot
> 
> ....after reboot, log in, and the constraint is back and ClusterIP has not 
> started.
> 
> 
> I have noticed in /var/lib/pacemaker/cib that the cib-x.raw files get created 
> when there are changes to the cib (cib.xml). After a reboot, I see the 
> constraint being added in a diff between .raw files:
> 
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# diff cib-7.raw cib-8.raw
> 1c1
> < <cib epoch="239" num_updates="0" admin_epoch="0" 
> validate-with="pacemaker-1.2" cib-last-written="Thu Feb 18 11:44:53 
> 2016" update-origin="g5se-f3efce" update-client="crm_resource" 
> crm_feature_set="3.0.9" have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="g5se-f3efce">
> ---
>> <cib epoch="240" num_updates="0" admin_epoch="0" 
>> validate-with="pacemaker-1.2" cib-last-written="Thu Feb 18 11:46:49 
>> 2016" update-origin="g5se-f3efce" update-client="crm_resource" 
>> crm_feature_set="3.0.9" have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="g5se-f3efce">
> 50c50,52
> <     <constraints/>
> ---
>>     <constraints>
>>       <rsc_location id="cli-ban-ClusterIP-on-g5se-f3efce" rsc="ClusterIP" 
>> role="Started" node="g5se-f3efce" score="-INFINITY"/>
>>     </constraints>
> 
> 
> I have also looked in /var/log/cluster/corosync.log and seen logs where it 
> seems the cib is getting updated. I'm not sure if the constraint is being put 
> back in at shutdown or at start up. I just don't understand why it's being 
> put back in. I don't think our daemon code or other scripts are doing this,  
> but it is something I could verify.

I would look at any scripts running around that time first. Constraints that 
start with "cli-" were created by one of the CLI tools, so something must be 
calling it. The most likely candidates are pcs resource move/ban or 
crm_resource -M/--move/-B/--ban.

> ********************************
> 
> From "yum info pacemaker", my current version is:
> 
> Name        : pacemaker
> Arch        : x86_64
> Version     : 1.1.12
> Release     : 8.el6_7.2
> 
> My earlier version was:
> 
> Name        : pacemaker
> Arch        : x86_64
> Version     : 1.1.10
> Release     : 1.el6_4.4
> 
> I'm still using an earlier version pcs, because the new one seems to have 
> issues with python:
> 
> Name        : pcs
> Arch        : noarch
> Version     : 0.9.90
> Release     : 1.0.1.el6.centos
> 
> *******************************
> 
> If anyone has ideas on the cause or thoughts on this, anything would be 
> greatly appreciated.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> 
> Jeremy Matthews

-----Original Message-----
From: users-requ...@clusterlabs.org [mailto:users-requ...@clusterlabs.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 2:21 AM
To: users@clusterlabs.org
Subject: Users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 35

Send Users mailing list submissions to
        users@clusterlabs.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        users-requ...@clusterlabs.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        users-ow...@clusterlabs.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of Users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Too quick node reboot leads to failed corosync assert on
      other node(s) (Michal Koutn?)
   2. ClusterIP location constraint reappears after reboot
      (Jeremy Matthews)
   3. Re: ClusterIP location constraint reappears after reboot
      (Ken Gaillot)
   4. Re: Too quick node reboot leads to failed corosync assert on
      other node(s) (Jan Friesse)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:32:48 +0100
From: Michal Koutn? <mkou...@suse.com>
To: users@clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Too quick node reboot leads to failed
        corosync assert on other node(s)
Message-ID: <56c5f230.6020...@suse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

On 02/18/2016 10:40 AM, Christine Caulfield wrote:
> I definitely remember looking into this, or something very like it, 
> ages ago. I can't find anything in the commit logs for either corosync 
> or cman that looks relevant though. If you're seeing it on recent 
> builds then it's obviously still a problem anyway and we ought to look into 
> it!
Thanks for you replies.

So far this happened only once and we've done only "post mortem", alas no 
available reproducer. If I have time, I'll try to reproduce it locally and 
check whether it exists in the current version.

Michal

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: 
<http://clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160218/97908c9d/attachment-0001.sig>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:07:19 +0000
From: Jeremy Matthews <jeremy.matth...@genband.com>
To: "users@clusterlabs.org" <users@clusterlabs.org>
Subject: [ClusterLabs] ClusterIP location constraint reappears after
        reboot
Message-ID:
        <ba3fced1d982a94aa64964f08b104956012d760...@gbplmail01.genband.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Hi,

We're having an issue with our cluster where after a reboot of our system a 
location constraint reappears for the ClusterIP. This causes a problem, because 
we have a daemon that checks the cluster state and waits until the ClusterIP is 
started before it kicks off our application. We didn't have this issue when 
using an earlier version of pacemaker. Here is the constraint as shown by pcs:

[root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs constraint
Location Constraints:
  Resource: ClusterIP
    Disabled on: g5se-f3efce (role: Started) Ordering Constraints:
Colocation Constraints:

...and here is our cluster status with the ClusterIP being Stopped:

[root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs status
Cluster name: cl-g5se-f3efce
Last updated: Thu Feb 18 11:36:01 2016
Last change: Thu Feb 18 10:48:33 2016 via crm_resource on g5se-f3efce
Stack: cman
Current DC: g5se-f3efce - partition with quorum
Version: 1.1.11-97629de
1 Nodes configured
4 Resources configured


Online: [ g5se-f3efce ]

Full list of resources:

sw-ready-g5se-f3efce   (ocf::pacemaker:GBmon): Started g5se-f3efce
meta-data      (ocf::pacemaker:GBmon): Started g5se-f3efce
netmon (ocf::heartbeat:ethmonitor):    Started g5se-f3efce
ClusterIP      (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):       Stopped


The cluster really just has one node at this time.

I retrieve the constraint ID, remove the constraint, verify that ClusterIP is 
started,  and then reboot:

[root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs constraint ref ClusterIP
Resource: ClusterIP
  cli-ban-ClusterIP-on-g5se-f3efce
[root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs constraint remove cli-ban-ClusterIP-on-g5se-f3efce

[root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs status
Cluster name: cl-g5se-f3efce
Last updated: Thu Feb 18 11:45:09 2016
Last change: Thu Feb 18 11:44:53 2016 via crm_resource on g5se-f3efce
Stack: cman
Current DC: g5se-f3efce - partition with quorum
Version: 1.1.11-97629de
1 Nodes configured
4 Resources configured


Online: [ g5se-f3efce ]

Full list of resources:

sw-ready-g5se-f3efce   (ocf::pacemaker:GBmon): Started g5se-f3efce
meta-data      (ocf::pacemaker:GBmon): Started g5se-f3efce
netmon (ocf::heartbeat:ethmonitor):    Started g5se-f3efce
ClusterIP      (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):       Started g5se-f3efce


[root@g5se-f3efce cib]# reboot

....after reboot, log in, and the constraint is back and ClusterIP has not 
started.


I have noticed in /var/lib/pacemaker/cib that the cib-x.raw files get created 
when there are changes to the cib (cib.xml). After a reboot, I see the 
constraint being added in a diff between .raw files:

[root@g5se-f3efce cib]# diff cib-7.raw cib-8.raw
1c1
< <cib epoch="239" num_updates="0" admin_epoch="0" 
validate-with="pacemaker-1.2" cib-last-written="Thu Feb 18 11:44:53 2016" 
update-origin="g5se-f3efce" update-client="crm_resource" 
crm_feature_set="3.0.9" have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="g5se-f3efce">
---
> <cib epoch="240" num_updates="0" admin_epoch="0" 
> validate-with="pacemaker-1.2" cib-last-written="Thu Feb 18 11:46:49 
> 2016" update-origin="g5se-f3efce" update-client="crm_resource" 
> crm_feature_set="3.0.9" have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="g5se-f3efce">
50c50,52
<     <constraints/>
---
>     <constraints>
>       <rsc_location id="cli-ban-ClusterIP-on-g5se-f3efce" rsc="ClusterIP" 
> role="Started" node="g5se-f3efce" score="-INFINITY"/>
>     </constraints>


I have also looked in /var/log/cluster/corosync.log and seen logs where it 
seems the cib is getting updated. I'm not sure if the constraint is being put 
back in at shutdown or at start up. I just don't understand why it's being put 
back in. I don't think our daemon code or other scripts are doing this,  but it 
is something I could verify.

********************************

>From "yum info pacemaker", my current version is:

Name        : pacemaker
Arch        : x86_64
Version     : 1.1.12
Release     : 8.el6_7.2

My earlier version was:

Name        : pacemaker
Arch        : x86_64
Version     : 1.1.10
Release     : 1.el6_4.4

I'm still using an earlier version pcs, because the new one seems to have 
issues with python:

Name        : pcs
Arch        : noarch
Version     : 0.9.90
Release     : 1.0.1.el6.centos

*******************************

If anyone has ideas on the cause or thoughts on this, anything would be greatly 
appreciated.

Thanks!



Jeremy Matthews


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160218/8a4b99fd/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:37:31 -0600
From: Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com>
To: users@clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] ClusterIP location constraint reappears
        after reboot
Message-ID: <56c61d7b.9090...@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

On 02/18/2016 01:07 PM, Jeremy Matthews wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We're having an issue with our cluster where after a reboot of our system a 
> location constraint reappears for the ClusterIP. This causes a problem, 
> because we have a daemon that checks the cluster state and waits until the 
> ClusterIP is started before it kicks off our application. We didn't have this 
> issue when using an earlier version of pacemaker. Here is the constraint as 
> shown by pcs:
> 
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs constraint Location Constraints:
>   Resource: ClusterIP
>     Disabled on: g5se-f3efce (role: Started) Ordering Constraints:
> Colocation Constraints:
> 
> ...and here is our cluster status with the ClusterIP being Stopped:
> 
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs status
> Cluster name: cl-g5se-f3efce
> Last updated: Thu Feb 18 11:36:01 2016 Last change: Thu Feb 18 
> 10:48:33 2016 via crm_resource on g5se-f3efce
> Stack: cman
> Current DC: g5se-f3efce - partition with quorum
> Version: 1.1.11-97629de
> 1 Nodes configured
> 4 Resources configured
> 
> 
> Online: [ g5se-f3efce ]
> 
> Full list of resources:
> 
> sw-ready-g5se-f3efce   (ocf::pacemaker:GBmon): Started g5se-f3efce
> meta-data      (ocf::pacemaker:GBmon): Started g5se-f3efce
> netmon (ocf::heartbeat:ethmonitor):    Started g5se-f3efce
> ClusterIP      (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):       Stopped
> 
> 
> The cluster really just has one node at this time.
> 
> I retrieve the constraint ID, remove the constraint, verify that ClusterIP is 
> started,  and then reboot:
> 
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs constraint ref ClusterIP
> Resource: ClusterIP
>   cli-ban-ClusterIP-on-g5se-f3efce
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs constraint remove 
> cli-ban-ClusterIP-on-g5se-f3efce
> 
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# pcs status
> Cluster name: cl-g5se-f3efce
> Last updated: Thu Feb 18 11:45:09 2016 Last change: Thu Feb 18 
> 11:44:53 2016 via crm_resource on g5se-f3efce
> Stack: cman
> Current DC: g5se-f3efce - partition with quorum
> Version: 1.1.11-97629de
> 1 Nodes configured
> 4 Resources configured
> 
> 
> Online: [ g5se-f3efce ]
> 
> Full list of resources:
> 
> sw-ready-g5se-f3efce   (ocf::pacemaker:GBmon): Started g5se-f3efce
> meta-data      (ocf::pacemaker:GBmon): Started g5se-f3efce
> netmon (ocf::heartbeat:ethmonitor):    Started g5se-f3efce
> ClusterIP      (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):       Started g5se-f3efce
> 
> 
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# reboot
> 
> ....after reboot, log in, and the constraint is back and ClusterIP has not 
> started.
> 
> 
> I have noticed in /var/lib/pacemaker/cib that the cib-x.raw files get created 
> when there are changes to the cib (cib.xml). After a reboot, I see the 
> constraint being added in a diff between .raw files:
> 
> [root@g5se-f3efce cib]# diff cib-7.raw cib-8.raw
> 1c1
> < <cib epoch="239" num_updates="0" admin_epoch="0" 
> validate-with="pacemaker-1.2" cib-last-written="Thu Feb 18 11:44:53 
> 2016" update-origin="g5se-f3efce" update-client="crm_resource" 
> crm_feature_set="3.0.9" have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="g5se-f3efce">
> ---
>> <cib epoch="240" num_updates="0" admin_epoch="0" 
>> validate-with="pacemaker-1.2" cib-last-written="Thu Feb 18 11:46:49 
>> 2016" update-origin="g5se-f3efce" update-client="crm_resource" 
>> crm_feature_set="3.0.9" have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="g5se-f3efce">
> 50c50,52
> <     <constraints/>
> ---
>>     <constraints>
>>       <rsc_location id="cli-ban-ClusterIP-on-g5se-f3efce" rsc="ClusterIP" 
>> role="Started" node="g5se-f3efce" score="-INFINITY"/>
>>     </constraints>
> 
> 
> I have also looked in /var/log/cluster/corosync.log and seen logs where it 
> seems the cib is getting updated. I'm not sure if the constraint is being put 
> back in at shutdown or at start up. I just don't understand why it's being 
> put back in. I don't think our daemon code or other scripts are doing this,  
> but it is something I could verify.

I would look at any scripts running around that time first. Constraints that 
start with "cli-" were created by one of the CLI tools, so something must be 
calling it. The most likely candidates are pcs resource move/ban or 
crm_resource -M/--move/-B/--ban.

> ********************************
> 
> From "yum info pacemaker", my current version is:
> 
> Name        : pacemaker
> Arch        : x86_64
> Version     : 1.1.12
> Release     : 8.el6_7.2
> 
> My earlier version was:
> 
> Name        : pacemaker
> Arch        : x86_64
> Version     : 1.1.10
> Release     : 1.el6_4.4
> 
> I'm still using an earlier version pcs, because the new one seems to have 
> issues with python:
> 
> Name        : pcs
> Arch        : noarch
> Version     : 0.9.90
> Release     : 1.0.1.el6.centos
> 
> *******************************
> 
> If anyone has ideas on the cause or thoughts on this, anything would be 
> greatly appreciated.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> 
> Jeremy Matthews




------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:18:22 +0100
From: Jan Friesse <jfrie...@redhat.com>
To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering
        welcomed        <users@clusterlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Too quick node reboot leads to failed
        corosync assert on other node(s)
Message-ID: <56c6cfce.5060...@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Michal Koutn? napsal(a):
> On 02/18/2016 10:40 AM, Christine Caulfield wrote:
>> I definitely remember looking into this, or something very like it, 
>> ages ago. I can't find anything in the commit logs for either 
>> corosync or cman that looks relevant though. If you're seeing it on 
>> recent builds then it's obviously still a problem anyway and we ought to 
>> look into it!
> Thanks for you replies.
>
> So far this happened only once and we've done only "post mortem", alas 
> no available reproducer. If I have time, I'll try to reproduce it

Ok. Actually I was trying to reproduce and was really not successful (current 
master). Steps I've used:
- 2 nodes, token set to 30 sec
- execute cpgbench on node2
- pause node1 corosync (ctrl+z), kill node1 corosync (kill -9 %1)
- wait until corosync on node2 move into "entering GATHER state from..."
- execute corosync on node1

Basically during recovery new node trans list was never send (and/or ignored by 
node2).

I'm going to try test v1.4.7, but it's also possible that bug is fixed by other 
commits (my favorites are cfbb021e130337603fe5b545d1e377296ecb92ea,
4ee84c51fa73c4ec7cbee922111a140a3aaf75df,
f135b680967aaef1d466f40170c75ae3e470e147).

Regards,
   Honza

> locally and check whether it exists in the current version.
>
> Michal
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org 
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: 
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>




------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users


End of Users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 35
*************************************


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to