On 04/08/16 13:01, Jan Friesse wrote:
>> pacemaker 1.1.12-11.12
>> openais 1.1.4-5.24.5
>> corosync 1.4.7-0.23.5
>>
>> Its a two node active/passive cluster and we just upgraded the SLES 11
>> SP 3 to SLES 11 SP 4(nothing else) but when we try to start the
cluster
>> service we get the following error:
>>
>> "Totem is unable to form a cluster because of an operating system or
>> network fault."
>>
>> Firewall is stopped and disabled on both the nodes. Both nodes can
>> ping/ssh/vnc each other.
>
> Hard to help. First of all, I would recommend to ask SUSE support
because I don't really have access to source code of corosync
1.4.7-0.23.5 package, so really don't know what patches are added.
>
>
Yup, ticket opened with SUSE Support.
>>
>>
>>
>> /var/log/messages:
>> Apr 6 17:51:49 prd1 corosync[8672]: [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine
>> ('1.4.7'): started and ready to provide service.
>> Apr 6 17:51:49 prd1 corosync[8672]: [MAIN ] Corosync built-in
>> features: nss
>> Apr 6 17:51:49 prd1 corosync[8672]: [MAIN ] Successfully configured
>> openais services to load
>> Apr 6 17:51:49 prd1 corosync[8672]: [MAIN ] Successfully read main
>> configuration file '/etc/corosync/corosync.conf'.
>> Apr 6 17:51:49 prd1 corosync[8672]: [TOTEM ] Initializing transport
>> (UDP/IP Unicast).
>> Apr 6 17:51:49 prd1 corosync[8672]: [TOTEM ] Initializing
>> transmit/receive security: libtomcrypt SOBER128/SHA1HMAC (mode 0).
>> Apr 6 17:51:49 prd1 corosync[8672]: [TOTEM ] The network interface is
>> down.
>
> ^^^ This is important line. It means corosync was unable to find
interface for bindnetaddr 192.168.150.0. Make sure interface with this
network address exists.
>
>
this machine has two IP address assigned on interface bond0
bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
link/ether 74:e6:e2:73:e5:61 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.150.20.91/24 brd 10.150.20.55 scope global bond0
inet 192.168.150.12/22 brd 192.168.151.255 scope global bond0:cluster
inet6 fe80::76e6:e2ff:fe73:e561/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
This is ifconfig output? I'm just wondering how you were able to set two
ipv4 addresses (in this format, I would expect another interface like
bond0:1 or nothing at all)?
Anyway, I was trying to create bonding interface and set second ipv4
(via ip addr) and corosync (flatiron what is 1.4.8 + 4 for your problem
completely unrelated patches) was able to detect it without any problem.
I can recommend you to try:
- Set bindnetaddr to IP address of given node (so you have to change
bindnetaddr on both nodes)
- Try upstream corosync 1.4.8/flatiron
Regards,
Honza
And I can ping 192.168.150.12 from this machine and from other machines
on network
--
Regards,
Muhammad Sharfuddin
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: [email protected]
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: [email protected]
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
