Hi,
Thank you for reply.
I tested the first method "multi-site cluster". it was ok with ticket manually
assignment. But I had issues with running Booth.I tested second method
"constraints and attributes". I make a cluster with 4 nodes and define some
constraints for nodes. But I have problems with node relations now.
I was searching in the docs then I found
"http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Remote/ch05.html".I
thinks this is very close to my answer. Do you offer this solution?
Regards,H.Yavari
From: Kristoffer Grönlund <[email protected]>
To: H Yavari <[email protected]>; Cluster Labs - All topics related
to open-source clustering welcomed <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, 18 May 2016, 10:36:39
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster
H Yavari <[email protected]> writes:
> Hi,
> So you think for this solution Booth is better or attribute method? I'm not
> familiar with them so can you share your experiences with them?Many thanks.
>
I think a single cluster using node attributes should be a lot easier to
understand and maintain, so I'd recommend that solution if it works out
for you.
Cheers,
Kristoffer
--
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: [email protected]
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
