On 18/06/16 03:04 PM, Dmitri Maziuk wrote: > On 2016-06-18 05:15, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > ... >> On the other hand, one could argue that restarting failed services >> should be the default behavior of systemd (or any init system). Still, >> it is not. > > As an off-topic snide comment, I never understood the thinking behind > that: restarting without removing the cause of the failure will just > make it fail again. If at first you don't succeed, then try, try, try > again? > > Dimitri
When your focus is availability, restarting makes sense. What you want to do is alert an admin that a restart was needed, so that he or she can investigate the cause. Pacemaker 1.1.15 allows for this alerting now. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org