On 05/07/16 10:07 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 07/04/2016 03:52 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> 01.07.2016 18:26, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>>> You're right, "parameters" or "params" would be more consistent with
>>> existing usage. "Instance attributes" is probably the most technically
>>> correct term. I'll vote for "reload-params"
>> 
>> May be "reconfigure" fits better? This would at least introduce an
>> action name which does not intersect with LSB/systemd/etc.
>> 
>> "reload" is for service itself as admin would expect, "reconfigure" is
>> for its controlling resource.
>> 
>> [...]
> 
> I like "reconfigure", but then the new parameter attribute should be
> "reconfigurable", which could be confusing. "All my parameters are
> reconfigurable!" I suppose we could call the attribute
> "change_triggers_reconfigure".

# old contestants

reload-attributes
reload-parameters
reload-params           reloadable

reconfigure             reconfigurable

# new contestants
# (in bigger distance from "reload" and in some cases with a slight
# personification of "agent")

reflect                 reflectable
reconcile               reconcilable
consult                 consultable     # Prolog influence
pull                    pullable        # git/pcs/... influence
sink                    sinkable        # as in "sink in"
comprehend              comprehensible

[add yours for this next round of brainstorming]

-- 
Jan (Poki)

Attachment: pgpKD4WodNBis.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: [email protected]
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to