11.07.2016 09:33, Ulrich Windl пишет: >>>> Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> schrieb am 09.07.2016 um 10:17 in > Nachricht <5780b30a.3000...@gmail.com>: >> 08.07.2016 09:11, Ulrich Windl пишет: >>>>>> "Carlos Xavier" <cbas...@connection.com.br> schrieb am 07.07.2016 um > 18:57 in >>> Nachricht <00e901d1d870$ae418000$0ac48000$@com.br>: >>>> Tank you for the fast reply >>>> >>>>> >>>>> have you configured the stonith and drbd stonith handler? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes. they were configured. >>>> The cluster was running fine for more than 4 years, until we loose one > host >>>> by power supply failure. >>>> Now I need to access the files on the host that is working. >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> MHO: Have you ever tested the configuration? I wonder why the cluster did >> not do everything to continue. >>> >> >> Stonith most likely failed if node experience complete power failure. We > > You could see a message if that were the case; otherwise the cluster should > assume the node was killed after the stonith timeout. >
I sincerely hope you do not really mean it. If stonith timed out, cluster cannot assume absolutely anything and definitely *NOT* that node was killed. >> were not shown cluster state, so it is just guess; but normally the way >> to recover is to manually declare node as down. Although this does it >> for pacemaker only; I do not know how to do the same for DRBD (unless >> pacemaker somehow forwards this information to it). > > DRBD has it own timouts (AFAIR). > That not what I meant. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org