when I'm using corosync-quorumtool [-l] and have my ring0_addr set to a IP address, which does not resolve to a hostname, I get the nodes IP addresses for the 'Name' column.

As I'm using the nodelist.node.X.name key to set the name of a node it seems a bit confusing to me that not this one gets preferred or at least also outputted. Its quite a minor issue if
not nit picking but as I associate my nodes with there name I.

I'd be ready to assemble a patch and one possibility would be adapting the output to something

# corosync-quorumtool

Quorum information
Date:             Tue Sep 20 11:12:14 2016
Quorum provider:  corosync_votequorum
Nodes:            3
Node ID:          1
Ring ID:          1/1784
Quorate:          Yes

Votequorum information
Expected votes:   3
Highest expected: 3
Total votes:      3
Quorum:           2
Flags:            Quorate

Membership information
    Nodeid      Votes Name ring0_addr
         1          1 uno (local)
         2          1 due
         3          1 tre

And respective:

# corosync-quorumtool -l

Membership information
    Nodeid      Votes Name ring0_addr
         1          1 uno (local)
         2          1 due
         3          1 tre

additional ring1_addr could be also outputted if set.

This would be just a general idea, if there are suggestions I'll gladly hear them.

As such a change may be not ideal during a stable release, e.g as corosync user could parse the corosync-quorumtool output (I mean there are quite better places to get the info but there may be still user doing this) another possibility would be adding an option flag to corosync similar to '-i' (show node IP addresses instead of the resolved name) which then shows the nodelist.node.X.name value instead of IP or resolved name.

Another, third, option would be letting the output as is but if the '-i' option is not set prefer the nodelist.node.X.name over the resolved hostname and fall back to IP if
both are not available.
I'd almost prefer this change the most, it lets the output as it is and it seems logical
that the Name column outputs the name key if possible, imo.

Would such a patch be welcomed or is this just something I find a little strange?


Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to