On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:10:08 -0800
Israel Brewster <isr...@ravnalaska.net> wrote:

> On Oct 14, 2016, at 1:39 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <j...@dalibo.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:11:06 -0800
> > Israel Brewster <isr...@ravnalaska.net> wrote:


> > I **guess** if you really want a shutdown to occurs,

I meant Ā«failoverĀ» here, not shutdown, sorry.

> > you need to simulate a real failure, not shutting down the first node
> > cleanly. Try to kill corosync.  
> From an academic standpoint the result of that test (which, incidentally,
> were the same as the results of every other test I've done) are interesting,
> however from a practical standpoint I'm not sure it helps much - most of the
> "failures" that I experience are intentional: I want to fail over to the
> other machine so I can run some software updates, reboot for whatever reason,
> shutdown temporarily to upgrade the hardware, or whatever. 

As far as I know, this is switch over. Planed switch over.

And you should definitely check PAF then :)


Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais

Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to