On 02/09/2017 05:08 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 02/08/2017 02:15 AM, Ferenc Wágner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There was an interesting discussion on this list about "Doing reload >> right" last July (which I still haven't digested entirely). Now I've >> got a related question about the current and intented behavior: what >> happens if a reload operation fails? I found some suggestions in >> http://ocf.community.tummy.narkive.com/RngPlNfz/adding-reload-to-the-ocf-specification, >> from 11 years back, and the question wasn't clear cut at all. Now I'm >> contemplating adding best-effort reloads to an RA, but not sure what >> behavior I can expect and depend on in the long run. I'd be grateful >> for your insights. > Seeing this, it occurs to me that commit messages should have links to > relevant mailing list threads, it makes the reason for various choices > so much clearer :-)
Or at least the other way round a - maybe final - reply to a thread on the list that hold relevant commits ... > > As with any operation, a reload failure should be handled according to > its exit code and its on-fail attribute. (Well, any operation except > notify, as became apparent in another recent thread.) > > By default, that means a restart (stop then start). > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org > http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org