On 04/11/2017 12:11 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > On 04/10/2017 03:58 PM, Chad Cravens wrote: > >> However, we are considering if pacemaker would be a good solution for high >> availability for an embedded control system that integrates with CAN for >> vehicles? > When fencing puts my vehicle in a "known" state, I'd want to be very > sure it's the *safe* state. >
*safe* for -- the other vehicles driving along... So instant vaporization would probably best meet our otherwise valid definition of fencing. Sorry couldn't resist, Klaus > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org > http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org