On 07/04/2017 04:52 PM, Cesar Hernandez wrote: >> The first line is the consequence of the 2nd. >> And the 1st says that node2 just has seen some fencing-resource >> positively reporting to have fenced himself - which >> is why crmd is exiting in a way that it is not respawned >> by pacemakerd. > Thanks. But my script have a logfile, I've checked it, and none of the nodes > have fenced himself: node1 has always fenced node2, and node2 has always > fenced node 1
Didn't say it has fenced itself. Actually it writes node1 has fenced node2 on behalf of node1. But obviously that is not true as otherwise node2 wouldn't be alive to receive that info. Might be kind of a strange race as well ... but without knowing what the script actually does ... Regards, Klaus > Cheers > Cesar > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org