On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:04:35 +0100 Kristoffer Grönlund <kgronl...@suse.com> wrote:
> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <j...@dalibo.com> writes: > > > > > For what is worth, while using crmsh, I always have to explain to > > people or customers that: > > > > * we should issue an "unmigrate" to remove the constraint as soon as the > > resource can get back to the original node or get off the current node if > > needed (depending on the -inf or +inf constraint location issued) > > * this will not migrate back the resource if it's sticky enough on the > > current node. > > > > See: > > http://clusterlabs.github.io/PAF/Debian-8-admin-cookbook.html#swapping-master-and-slave-roles-between-nodes > > > > This is counter-intuitive, indeed. I prefer the pcs interface using > > the move/clear actions. > > No need! You can use crm rsc move / crm rsc clear. In fact, "unmove" is > just a backwards-compatibility alias for clear in crmsh. Thanks for the tip! I'll update the docs next week. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
