On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote: > 23.03.2018 20:42, Sam Gardner пишет: >> Thanks, Ken. >> >> I just want all master-mode resources to be running wherever DRBDFS is >> running (essentially). If the cluster detects that any of the master-mode >> resources can't run on the current node (but can run on the other per >> ethmon), all other master-mode resources as well as DRBDFS should move over >> to the other node. >> >> The current set of constraints I have will let DRBDFS move to the standby >> node and "take" the Master mode resources with it, but the Master mode >> resources failing over to the other node won't take the other Master >> resources or DRBDFS. >> > > I do not think it is possible. There is no way to express symmetrical > colocation rule like "always run A and B together". You start with A and > place B relative to A; but then A is not affected by B's state. > Attempting now to place A relative to B will result in a loop and is > ignored. See also old discussion: >
It is possible. Check this thread https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2017-November/006788.html Best regards, Alberto Mijares _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
