"Users" <[email protected]> schrieb am 19.07.2018 21:44:42:
> Von: Jan Pokorný <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Datum: 19.07.2018 21:46 > Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync/dlm fencing? > Gesendet von: "Users" <[email protected]> > > On 19/07/18 17:25 +0200, Philipp Achmüller wrote: > > "Users" <[email protected]> schrieb am 18.07.2018 15:46:09: > >> if it's unclear, 0.17.2 as the lowest version that's fixed > > > > following version is currently installed with SP3: > > > > libqb0-1.0.1-2.15.x86_64 > > Then the only blind bet is that this patch to libqb might have helped: > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/libqb/commit/ > 75ab31bdd05a15947dc56edf4d6b7f377355435e > > The issue that patch fixes might still fit the overall picture. ok - there isn't any release including this fix right now? > > Other than that, it might also have been some kind of system overload > that prevented corosync responding to its peers in a timely fashion, > for instance. No, when Problem occurs i do not see any kind of system overload thank you! > -- > Nazdar, > Jan (Poki) > [Anhang "attdrxae.dat" gelöscht von Philipp Achmüller/ARZ/AT] > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: [email protected] > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
