21.12.2018 12:09, Klaus Wenninger пишет: > On 12/21/2018 08:15 AM, Fulong Wang wrote: >> Hello Experts, >> >> I'm New to this mail lists. >> Pls kindlyforgive me if this mail has disturb you! >> >> Our Company recently is evaluating the usage of the SuSE HAE on x86 >> platform. >> Wen simulating the storage disaster fail-over, i finally found that >> the SBD communication functioned normal on SuSE11 SP4 but abnormal on >> SuSE12 SP3. > > I have no experience with SBD on SLES but I know that handling of the > logging verbosity-levels has changed recently in the upstream-repo. > Given that it was done by Yan Gao iirc I'd assume it went into SLES. > So changing the verbosity of the sbd-daemon might get you back > these logs.
Do you mean commit 2dbdee29736fcbf0fe1d41c306959b22d05f72b0 Author: Gao,Yan <[email protected]> Date: Mon Apr 30 18:02:04 2018 +0200 Log: upgrade important messages and downgrade unimportant ones ?? This commit actually increased severity for message on target node: @@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ int servant(const char *diskname, int mode, const void* argp) } if (s_mbox->cmd > 0) { - cl_log(LOG_INFO, + cl_log(LOG_NOTICE, "Received command %s from %s on disk %s", char2cmd(s_mbox->cmd), s_mbox->from, diskname); and did not change severity for messages on source node (they are still INFO). > And of course you can use the list command on the other node > to verify as well. > > Klaus > >> The SBD device was added during the initialization of the first >> cluster node. >> >> I have requested help from SuSE guys, but they didn't give me any >> valuable feedback yet now! >> >> >> Below are some screenshots to explain what i have encountered. >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> on a SuSE11 SP4 HAE cluster, i run the sbd test command as below: >> >> >> then there will be some information showed up in the local system >> message log >> >> >> >> on the second node, we can found that the communication is normal by >> >> >> >> but when i turn to a SuSE12 SP3 HAE cluster, ran the same command as >> above: >> >> >> >> I didn't get any response in the system message log. >> >> >> "systemctl status sbd" also doesn't give me any clue on this. >> >> >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> What could be the reason for this abnormal behavior? Is there any >> problems with my setup? >> Any suggestions are appreciate! >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> Regards >> FuLong >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list: [email protected] >> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: [email protected] > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
