Hi David, The DLM git repo accumulated a couple of patches over the 4.0.7 tag, would you mind cutting a new release for packaging?
Tangentially, would you be interested in an Autotoolized build system? The flag handling repeatedly gives me headaches, and I'd consider contributing that if you aren't opposed. And if DLM development continues with the current code base -- you mentioned new developments for recovering from network message loss, so I expect changes..? And once we're at it: the STONITH helper embedding to SONAME of the Pacemaker fencing library is pretty obscure and easy to miss on library transitions. I guess it's done to avoid unconditionally pulling in Pacemaker libraries and their dependencies. Don't you think this helper agent had better be a part of the Pacemaker CLI utilities instead? In my opinion the ABI coupling is stronger than the textual interface dlm_controld uses. But even if not, it would be possible to dynamically link the agent against the Pacemaker libraries and split it into a separate optional package to make all those dependencies avoidable on systems not using Pacemaker fencing. If all parties agree, of course. -- Thanks, Feri _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
