>>> <[email protected]> schrieb am 14.01.2019 um 11:48 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > Recently I spent some time mapping the interrelations of the C header > files constituting the Pacemaker API. In the end I decided they were so > tightly interdependent that there was really no useful way to ship parts > of the API separately, thus I did away with the separate lib*‑dev Debian > packages and merged them into a single pacemaker‑dev package, much like > the pacemaker‑libs‑devel RPM package created by the upstream spec file.
Time to use the machete in the source code! ;-) > > Now I'm looking at DLM, which uses the fencing API, and trying to use > pkg‑config for supplying the necessary flags. I got pretty sure the > pkg‑config files are incorrect, for example neither declares the > libxml‑2.0 dependency in stonith‑ng.h (which is to be dropped, but still > there). > > I'd like to get the pkg‑config support of Pacemaker corrected, but > before I start cooking up patches, I need to get an idea of the > preferred direction upstream. For a start: is providing multiple > pkg‑config files (still) reasonable? > ‑‑ > Thanks, > Feri > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: [email protected] > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
