>>> Maciej S <inter...@swierki.com> schrieb am 11.02.2019 um 12:34 in Nachricht <CAJtytUPk_ZNzpmFaq98aX3fXLHvCksK88PdSu=yv0-nfurc...@mail.gmail.com>: > I was wondering if anyone can give a plain answer if fencing is really > needed in case there are no shared resources being used (as far as I define > shared resource). > > We want to use PAF or other Postgres (with replicated data files on the > local drives) failover agent together with Corosync, Pacemaker and virtual > IP resource and I am wondering if there is a need for fencing (which is > very close bind to an infrastructure) if a Pacemaker is already controlling > resources state. I know that in failover case there might be a need to add > functionality to recover master that entered dirty shutdown state (eg. in > case of power outage), but I can't see any case where fencing is really > necessary. Am I wrong? > > I was looking for a strict answer but I couldn't find one...
I think you can try without. (as it was on TV yesterday: In "Terminator 2" Arnie is driving motorcycle without a helmet... So if you feel you can do pacemaker without fencing, go ahead ;-) > > Regards, > Maciej _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
