On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 10:20:21 +0100 Kristoffer Grönlund <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 10:13 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 09:59:16 +0100 > > Kristoffer Grönlund <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 08:27 +0100, Ivan Devát wrote: > > > > On 26. 03. 19 21:12, Brian Reichert wrote: > > > > > This will sound like a dumb question: > > > > > > > > > > The manpage for pcs(8) implies that to set up a cluster, one > > > > > needs > > > > > to provide a name. > > > > > > > > > > Why do clusters have names? > > > > > > > > > > Is there a use case wherein there would be multiple clusters > > > > > visible > > > > > in an administrative UI, such that they'd need to be > > > > > differentiated? > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example in a web UI of pcs is a page with multiple clusters. > > > > > > > > > > We use cluster names and rules to apply the same exact CIB to > > > multiple > > > clusters, particularly when configuring geo clusters. > > > > I'm not sure to understand. Is it possible to have multiple Pacemaker > > daemon instances on the same serveurs? > > > > Or do you mean it is possible to have multiple namespace where > > resources are > > isolated in and one Pacemaker daemon to manage them? > > > > I am not sure what you mean by the second, but I am fairly sure I don't > mean either of those :) I'm talking about having multiple actual, > distinct clusters distinct cluster of Pacemaker/corosync daemons on the same servers or distinct cluster of servers? > and sharing the same configuration across all of > them, Same configuration like, the same file or the same content accross different files? Sorry for being bold...I just don't get it :/ _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
