"Ulrich Windl" <[email protected]> writes: > <[email protected]> schrieb am 15.07.2019 um 18:41 in Nachricht > <[email protected]>: > >> In a mostly symmetrical cluster I've got a couple of resources which >> should only ever run on a subset of the nodes if possible. However, >> utilization constraints seem to prevent optimal resource allocation in >> some cases: Pacemaker does not migrate other resources to make room for >> the picky resources on their preferred nodes. Is there a way around >> this? The score differences are way above the resource stickiness, and >> as soon as I manually move enough indifferent resources away from the >> distinguished nodes, Pacemaker indeed migrates the picky resources over >> to them. Can I configure it to also make room automatically by moving >> other resources as necessary, making this process fully automatic? > > Maybe show your config in greater detail...
I'd like to keep the XML level low until I get confirmation that what I'm after is actually supported. My configuration is very simple but extensive, and has the basic elements in place: I can see the scores and utilization values in the crm_simulate output. I have priorities set up as well, but all resources are running, so that shouldn't matter as far as I understand it. Maybe I miss a setting to enable such behavior... -- Feri _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
