>>> Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> schrieb am 03.09.2019 um 16:35 in Nachricht <979978d5a488aabd9ed4a941ff4eac60c271c84d.ca...@redhat.com>: > On Mon, 2019‑09‑02 at 15:23 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Are there any recommendations where to place (fixed content) files an >> RA uses? >> Usually my RAs use a separate XML file for the metadata, just to >> allow editing it in XML mode automatically. >> Traditionally I put the file in the same directory as the RA itself >> (like "cat $0.xml" for meta‑data). >> Are there any expectations that every file in the RA directory is an >> RA? >> (Currently I'm extending an RA, and I'd like to provide some >> additional user‑modifiable template file, and I wonder which path to >> use) >> >> Regards, >> Ulrich > > I believe most (maybe even all modern?) deployments have both lib and > resource.d under /usr/lib/ocf. If you have a custom provider for the RA > under resource.d, it would make sense to use the same pattern under > lib.
So what concrete path are you suggesting? /usr/lib/<something>/<vendor>? > > If you want to follow the FHS, you might consider /usr/share if you're > installing via custom packages, /usr/local/share if you're just > installing locally, or /srv in either case. I thought about it, comiong to the conclusion that sharing RA agents and parts of it may not make much sense for HA trying to have independent nodes. > ‑‑ > Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/