On 4/8/20 3:09 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <j...@dalibo.com> schrieb am 07.04.2020 um 23:02 in
Nachricht
<20140_1586293370_5E8CEA7A_20140_452_1_20200407230230.1bc9b7b0@firost>:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:13:35 -0400
Sherrard Burton <sb-clusterl...@allafrica.com> wrote:
[...]
But the best protection is to disable pacemaker on boot so an admin can
investigate the situation and join back the node safely.
Actually before pacemaker we had a two-node cluster running without problems.
Maybe pacemaker should fix two-node mode.
Requiring manual intervention should be an absolute exception; instead the
fenced node should integrate to the existing cluster, or form a new cluster.
Both correctly, of course...
i concur completely. requiring manual intervention mostly defeats the
purpose of running a cluster manager.
_______________________________________________
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
