Yes, I saw that on corosync.conf man page also. I also tried with and without the bindnetaddr in my totem configuration (I dropped the whole interface {} section as in the example at the Ubuntu quickstart: https://clusterlabs.org/quickstart-ubuntu.html)
Thanks! *RICHARD E. NICKLE* *Sr. Technical Services Engineer* Information Technology Services rnic...@holycross.edu *phone: *(508) 793-2569 www.holycross.edu On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:49 PM Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote: > 05.05.2020 19:30, Nickle, Richard пишет: > > So I tried an experiment. I had tried switch over to 'udpu' unicast > > transport, but corosync threw an error starting up (which I did not drill > > down on yet.) > > > > I went over to my test environment and did the same thing and it worked > > fine, the cluster worked and everything. > > > > One thing that is different there is the test environment is on a network > > with CIDR /22, and the production network is on a CIDR /26. > > > > So, for my bindnetaddr on my test network, I have the address of my VIP, > or > > '192.168.193.113'. That would be a network base of '192.168.192.0'. > > > > But my production network is on '192.168.83.131', That would be a network > > base of '192.168.83.128'. > > > > I have tried hardcoding the 'bindnetaddr' to the network base > > '192.168.83.128', but it still throws an error. Perhaps it is 'zeroing' > > out the bindnetaddr least significant byte to make the network base? > > > > This should work according to documentation (which lists exactly the /26 > subnet). > > Anyway, bindnetaddr should not be used wit udpu transport at all. > > > Is it possible that the calculation of my base network in 'bindnetaddr' > > doesn't account for networks with CIDR mask bits greater than 24? (which > > would have non-zero least significant bytes.) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rick > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:03 PM Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> 05.05.2020 16:44, Nickle, Richard пишет: > >>> Thanks Honza and Andrei (and Strahil? I might have missed a message in > >> the > >>> thread...) > >>> > >> > >> Yep, all messages from Strahil end up in spam folder. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Manage your subscription: > >> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > >> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Manage your subscription: > > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/