more configure details:
/etc/hosts:
172.60.60.34 centosA
192.168.44.34 centosA-0
192.168.55.34 centosA-1
172.60.60.35 centosB
192.168.44.35 centosB-0
192.168.55.35 centosB-1
corosync.conf:
totem {
version: 2
secauth: on
cluster_name: mycluster
transport: udpu
rrp_mode: passive
}
nodelist {
node {
ring0_addr: centosA-0
ring1_addr: centosA-1
nodeid: 1
}
node {
ring0_addr: centosB-0
ring1_addr: centosB-1
nodeid: 2
}
}
Disconnect the heartbeat network cable ,and corosync-cfgtool -s:
RING ID 0
id = 127.0.0.1
status = ring 0 active with no faults
RING ID 1
id = 127.0.0.1
status = ring 1 active with no faults
heartbeat ip binding to 127.0.0.1
在 2020/5/13 下午2:32, kexue 写道:
Thanks.
Each node has 2 similarly connected/configured NIC's. Both nodes are
connected each other by two network cables.
'unplug' means Disconnect the network cable
在 2020/5/13 下午2:12, Strahil Nikolov 写道:
On May 12, 2020 3:10:28 PM GMT+03:00, kexue<kexue...@163.com> wrote:
Hi,
I have a two-nodes cluster on Centos7,and heartbeat interfaces connects
directly.
Execute "corosync-cfgtool -s" command :
# corosync-cfgtool -s
Printing ring status.
Local node ID 2
RING ID 0
id = 192.168.44.35
status = ring 0 active with no faults
RING ID 1
id = 192.168.55.35
status = ring 1 active with no faults
Unpluged the heartbeat network cable,Execute "corosync-cfgtool -s"
command :
# corosync-cfgtool -s
Printing ring status.
Local node ID 2
RING ID 0
id = 127.0.0.1
status = ring 0 active with no faults
RING ID 1
id = 127.0.0.1
status = ring 1 active with no faults
What is wrong with this? Could you give me some advice.
Thanks.
How do you 'unplug' the cable ?
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
--
kexue
=====================================================
-岂曰无衣-
E-mail: kexue...@163.com
--
kexue
=====================================================
-岂曰无衣-
E-mail: kexue...@163.com
_______________________________________________
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
