17.12.2020 14:02, Ulrich Windl пишет: >>>> Andrei Borzenkov <[email protected]> schrieb am 17.12.2020 um 09:50 in > Nachricht > <caa91j0vuv4nmtetcpqnimf-xrrv_9kqkcnpvman4xbonbqp...@mail.gmail.com>: > > ... >> According to logs from xstha1, it started to activate resources only >> after stonith was confirmed >> >> Dec 16 15:08:12 [708] stonith‑ng: notice: log_operation: >> Operation 'off' [1273] (call 4 from crmd.712) for host 'xstha2' with >> device 'xstha2‑stonith' returned: 0 (OK) >> Dec 16 15:08:12 [708] stonith‑ng: notice: remote_op_done: >> Operation 'off' targeting xstha2 on xstha1 for >> [email protected]: OK >> >> It is possible that your IPMI/BMC/whatever implementation responds >> with success before it actually completes this action. I have seen at > > Shouldn't a reasonable "stonith-timeout=180" do?
This is maximum time to wait for successful stonith. In this case stonith *was* successful - at least from the pacemaker point of view. _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
