Hi, Steffen. Those attachments don't contain the CIB. They contain the `pcs config` output. You can get the cib with `pcs cluster cib > $(hostname).cib.xml`.
Granted, it's possible that this fence action information wouldn't be in the CIB at all. It might be stored in fencer memory. On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:26 AM <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: > Hi Steffen, > > > Here CIB settings attached (pcs config show) for all 3 of my nodes > > (all 3 seems 100% identical), node03 is the DC. > > > Thank you for the attachment. > > What is the scenario when this situation occurs? > In what steps did the problem appear when fencing was performed (or > failed)? > > > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Steffen Vinther Sørensen <svint...@gmail.com> > > To: renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp; Cluster Labs - All topics related to > open-source clustering welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org> > > Cc: > > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 17:05 > > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status > > > > Hi Hideo, > > > > Here CIB settings attached (pcs config show) for all 3 of my nodes > > (all 3 seems 100% identical), node03 is the DC. > > > > Regards > > Steffen > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:06 AM <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Steffen, > >> Hi Reid, > >> > >> I also checked the Centos source rpm and it seems to include a fix for > the > > problem. > >> > >> As Steffen suggested, if you share your CIB settings, I might know > > something. > >> > >> If this issue is the same as the fix, the display will only be > displayed on > > the DC node and will not affect the operation. > >> The pending actions shown will remain for a long time, but will not > have a > > negative impact on the cluster. > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> Hideo Yamauchi. > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > From: Reid Wahl <nw...@redhat.com> > >> > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering > > welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org> > >> > Cc: > >> > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:58 > >> > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs > status > >> > > >> > It's supposedly fixed in that version. > >> > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787749 > >> > - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4713471 > >> > > >> > So you may be hitting a different issue (unless there's a bug in > > the > >> > pcmk 1.1 backport of the fix). > >> > > >> > I may be a little bit out of my area of knowledge here, but can you > >> > share the CIBs from nodes 1 and 3? Maybe Hideo, Klaus, or Ken has > some > >> > insight. > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:53 PM Steffen Vinther Sørensen > >> > <svint...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi Hideo, > >> >> > >> >> If the fix is not going to make it into the CentOS7 pacemaker > > version, > >> >> I guess the stable approach to take advantage of it is to build > > the > >> >> cluster on another OS than CentOS7 ? A little late for that in > > this > >> >> case though :) > >> >> > >> >> Regards > >> >> Steffen > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 7:27 AM <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> > > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > Hi Steffen, > >> >> > > >> >> > The fix pointed out by Reid is affecting it. > >> >> > > >> >> > Since the fencing action requested by the DC node exists > > only in the > >> > DC node, such an event occurs. > >> >> > You will need to take advantage of the modified pacemaker to > > resolve > >> > the issue. > >> >> > > >> >> > Best Regards, > >> >> > Hideo Yamauchi. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > ----- Original Message ----- > >> >> > > From: Reid Wahl <nw...@redhat.com> > >> >> > > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source > > clustering > >> > welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org> > >> >> > > Cc: > >> >> > > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:07 > >> >> > > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions > > shown in pcs > >> > status > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Hi, Steffen. Are your cluster nodes all running the > > same > >> > Pacemaker > >> >> > > versions? This looks like Bug 5401[1], which is fixed > > by upstream > >> >> > > commit df71a07[2]. I'm a little bit confused about > > why it > >> > only shows > >> >> > > up on one out of three nodes though. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > [1] https://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5401 > >> >> > > [2] > > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/df71a07 > >> >> > > > >> >> > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:31 AM Steffen Vinther Sørensen > >> >> > > <svint...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> Hello > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> node 1 is showing this in 'pcs status' > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> Pending Fencing Actions: > >> >> > >> * reboot of kvm03-node02.avigol-gcs.dk pending: > >> > client=crmd.37819, > >> >> > >> origin=kvm03-node03.avigol-gcs.dk > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> node 2 and node 3 outputs no such thing (node 3 is > > DC) > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> Google is not much help, how to investigate this > > further and > >> > get rid > >> >> > >> of such terrifying status message ? > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> Regards > >> >> > >> Steffen > >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> > >> Manage your subscription: > >> >> > >> > > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > >> >> > >> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > -- > >> >> > > Regards, > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Reid Wahl, RHCA > >> >> > > Senior Software Maintenance Engineer, Red Hat > >> >> > > CEE - Platform Support Delivery - ClusterHA > >> >> > > > >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > > Manage your subscription: > >> >> > > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> >> > > > >> >> > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > Manage your subscription: > >> >> > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> >> > > >> >> > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Manage your subscription: > >> >> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> >> > >> >> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > Reid Wahl, RHCA > >> > Senior Software Maintenance Engineer, Red Hat > >> > CEE - Platform Support Delivery - ClusterHA > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Manage your subscription: > >> > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > > >> > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Manage your subscription: > >> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > >> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > -- Regards, Reid Wahl, RHCA Senior Software Maintenance Engineer, Red Hat CEE - Platform Support Delivery - ClusterHA
_______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
