Hi Ulrich, > So you were asking for a specific section of the CIB like "cibadmin -Q -o > status"?
No. There is no need for a specific section of cib. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ulrich Windl <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> > To: users@clusterlabs.org; renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp > Cc: > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 17:57 > Subject: Antw: [EXT] Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs > status > >>>> <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> schrieb am 07.01.2021 um 09:51 > in Nachricht > <91782048.765666.1610009460932.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.co.jp>: >> Hi Steffen, >> Hi Reid, >> >> The fencing history is kept inside stonith-ng and is not written to cib. > > So you were asking for a specific section of the CIB like "cibadmin -Q -o > status"? > >> However, getting the entire cib and getting it sent will help you to >> reproduce the problem. >> >> Best Regards, >> Hideo Yamauchi. >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Reid Wahl <nw...@redhat.com> >>> To: renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp; Cluster Labs - All topics related to >> open-source clustering welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org> >>> Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 17:39 >>> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status >>> >>> >>> Hi, Steffen. Those attachments don't contain the CIB. They contain > the `pcs > >> config` output. You can get the cib with `pcs cluster cib > >> $(hostname).cib.xml`. >>> >>> >>> Granted, it's possible that this fence action information > wouldn't be in the > >> CIB at all. It might be stored in fencer memory. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:26 AM <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> > wrote: >>> >>> Hi Steffen, >>>> >>>>> Here CIB settings attached (pcs config show) for all 3 of my > nodes >>>>> (all 3 seems 100% identical), node03 is the DC. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you for the attachment. >>>> >>>> What is the scenario when this situation occurs? >>>> In what steps did the problem appear when fencing was performed (or > failed)? >>>> >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Hideo Yamauchi. >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: Steffen Vinther Sørensen <svint...@gmail.com> >>>>> To: renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp; Cluster Labs - All topics > related to >> open-source clustering welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org> >>>>> Cc: >>>>> Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 17:05 >>>>> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs > status >>>>> >>>>> Hi Hideo, >>>>> >>>>> Here CIB settings attached (pcs config show) for all 3 of my > nodes >>>>> (all 3 seems 100% identical), node03 is the DC. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Steffen >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:06 AM > <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Steffen, >>>>>> Hi Reid, >>>>>> >>>>>> I also checked the Centos source rpm and it seems to > include a fix for > the >>>>> problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> As Steffen suggested, if you share your CIB settings, I > might know >>>>> something. >>>>>> >>>>>> If this issue is the same as the fix, the display will > only be > displayed on >> >>>>> the DC node and will not affect the operation. >>>>>> The pending actions shown will remain for a long time, but > will not > have a >>>>> negative impact on the cluster. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>> Hideo Yamauchi. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> > From: Reid Wahl <nw...@redhat.com> >>>>>> > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source > clustering >>>>> welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org> >>>>>> > Cc: >>>>>> > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:58 >>>>>> > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions > shown in pcs > status >>>>>> > >>>>>> > It's supposedly fixed in that version. >>>>>> > - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787749 >>>>>> > - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4713471 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > So you may be hitting a different issue (unless > there's a bug in >>>>> the >>>>>> > pcmk 1.1 backport of the fix). >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I may be a little bit out of my area of knowledge > here, but can you >>>>>> > share the CIBs from nodes 1 and 3? Maybe Hideo, > Klaus, or Ken has > some >>>>>> > insight. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:53 PM Steffen Vinther > Sørensen >>>>>> > <svint...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Hi Hideo, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> If the fix is not going to make it into the > CentOS7 pacemaker >>>>> version, >>>>>> >> I guess the stable approach to take advantage of > it is to build >>>>> the >>>>>> >> cluster on another OS than CentOS7 ? A little > late for that in >>>>> this >>>>>> >> case though :) >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Regards >>>>>> >> Steffen >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 7:27 AM > <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Hi Steffen, >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > The fix pointed out by Reid is affecting > it. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Since the fencing action requested by the > DC node exists >>>>> only in the >>>>>> > DC node, such an event occurs. >>>>>> >> > You will need to take advantage of the > modified pacemaker to >>>>> resolve >>>>>> > the issue. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Best Regards, >>>>>> >> > Hideo Yamauchi. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> >> > > From: Reid Wahl > <nw...@redhat.com> >>>>>> >> > > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related > to open-source >>>>> clustering >>>>>> > welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org> >>>>>> >> > > Cc: >>>>>> >> > > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:07 >>>>>> >> > > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending > Fencing Actions >>>>> shown in pcs >>>>>> > status >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > Hi, Steffen. Are your cluster nodes > all running the >>>>> same >>>>>> > Pacemaker >>>>>> >> > > versions? This looks like Bug 5401[1], > which is fixed >>>>> by upstream >>>>>> >> > > commit df71a07[2]. I'm a little > bit confused about >>>>> why it >>>>>> > only shows >>>>>> >> > > up on one out of three nodes though. >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > [1] > https://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5401 >>>>>> >> > > [2] >>>>> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/df71a07 >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:31 AM Steffen > Vinther Sørensen >>>>>> >> > > <svint...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> Hello >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> node 1 is showing this in > 'pcs status' >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> Pending Fencing Actions: >>>>>> >> > >> * reboot of > kvm03-node02.avigol-gcs.dk pending: >>>>>> > client=crmd.37819, >>>>>> >> > >> origin=kvm03-node03.avigol-gcs.dk >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> node 2 and node 3 outputs no such > thing (node 3 is >>>>> DC) >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> Google is not much help, how to > investigate this >>>>> further and >>>>>> > get rid >>>>>> >> > >> of such terrifying status message > ? >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> Regards >>>>>> >> > >> Steffen >>>>>> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> >> > >> Manage your subscription: >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> ClusterLabs home: > https://www.clusterlabs.org/ >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > -- >>>>>> >> > > Regards, >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > Reid Wahl, RHCA >>>>>> >> > > Senior Software Maintenance Engineer, > Red Hat >>>>>> >> > > CEE - Platform Support Delivery - > ClusterHA >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> >> > > Manage your subscription: >>>>>> >> > > > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > ClusterLabs home: > https://www.clusterlabs.org/ >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> >> > Manage your subscription: >>>>>> >> > > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > ClusterLabs home: > https://www.clusterlabs.org/ >>>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> >> Manage your subscription: >>>>>> >> > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > -- >>>>>> > Regards, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Reid Wahl, RHCA >>>>>> > Senior Software Maintenance Engineer, Red Hat >>>>>> > CEE - Platform Support Delivery - ClusterHA >>>>>> > >>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > Manage your subscription: >>>>>> > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Manage your subscription: >>>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>> >>>>>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Manage your subscription: >>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>> >>>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Reid Wahl, RHCA >>> >>> Senior Software Maintenance Engineer, Red Hat >>> CEE - Platform Support Delivery - ClusterHA >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Manage your subscription: >> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/