>>> Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> schrieb am 30.04.2021 um 16:57 in Nachricht <3acef4bc31923fb019619c713300444c2dcd354a.ca...@redhat.com>: > On Fri, 2021‑04‑30 at 11:00 +0100, lejeczek wrote: >> Hi guys >> >> I'd like to ask around for thoughts & suggestions on any >> semi/official ways to monitor VirtualDomain. >> Something beyond what included RA does ‑ such as actual >> health testing of and communication with VM's OS. >> >> many thanks, L. > > This use case led to a Pacemaker feature many moons ago ... > > Pacemaker supports nagios plug‑ins as a resource type (e.g. > nagios:check_apache_status). These are service checks usually used with > monitoring software such as nagios, icinga, etc. > > If the service being monitored is inside a VirtualDomain, named vm1 for > example, you can configure the nagios resource with the resource meta‑ > attribute container="vm1". If the nagios check fails, Pacemaker will > restart vm1.
"check fails" mans WARNING, CRITICAL, or UNKNOWN? ;-) > > (This feature was added before OS containers became popular, so the > naming is a bit unfortunate.) > ‑‑ > Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
