On Mon, 2021-10-25 at 13:44 +0000, Toby Haynes wrote: > Looking at Pacemaker 2.1, I see that both corosync 2 and corosync 3 > are supported. The last corosync 2 release (2.4.5) came out in 30 > July 2019. Will there come a point when a future Pacemaker release > might only support the Corosync 3 (or later) series?
There's nothing that Pacemaker has to do specially for Corosync 2 vs 3, so it's unlikely support will ever be dropped for just 2. Of course everything changes eventually, but nothing's on the horizon. If you're choosing between the two, keep in mind Corosync 3 doesn't support rolling upgrades from 2, even though Pacemaker itself doesn't care. > Are there good use cases today where Corosync 2 is a better choice? Not that I know of. I'd only use it when it's what the OS provides. There are a few features only supported by 2 (like node discovery via multicast), but I don't think they're worth staying on 2. > Thanks, > > Toby Haynes -- Ken Gaillot <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
