On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 7:20 AM Madison Kelly <mke...@alteeve.com> wrote: > > I was taking Ken's advice. Originally my plan was to use location > constraints, but I assume Ken's reasoning was sound for the node attribute > approach.
Location constraints should work for the simple test case you presented. There's probably some additional nuance that came up in your discussion with Ken. Rules and node attributes can be more flexible when the situation is more complex than just "don't run on the node with this particular node name". > > On 2022-11-29 02:51, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > Why can't you use a plain location constraint? > > Madison Kelly <mke...@alteeve.com> schrieb am 29.11.2022 um 05:21 in Nachricht > > > -- > Madison Kelly > Alteeve's Niche! > Chief Technical Officer > c: +1-647-471-0951 > https://alteeve.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ -- Regards, Reid Wahl (He/Him) Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat RHEL High Availability - Pacemaker _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
