>>> Dave Withheld <davewithh...@hotmail.com> schrieb am 08.12.2022 um 08:03 in Nachricht <sn4p221mb080999277caf5581807c2628de...@sn4p221mb0809.namp221.prod.outlook.com>:
> In our production factory, we run a 2‑node cluster on CentOS 8 with pacemaker, > a virtual IP, and drbd for shared storage with samba (among other services) > running as a resource on the active node. Everything works great except when Did you consider using CTDB Samba and dual-primary DRBD instead? CTDB samba replicates connection information to the nodes, so if one goes down, the other knows about the clients... > we fail over. All resources are moved to the other node and start just fine, > but Windows hosts that have connections to the samba shares all have to be > rebooted before they can reconnect. Clients that were not connected can > connect. We have samba configured for only SMB1 protocol and all Windows > clients are configured to allow it. > > Maybe this is a question for the samba folks, but thought I'd try here first > since it's only a problem when the other node takes over the samba resource. > Anyone seen this problem and solved it? _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
