Tomas,
Our cib is at 3.8 as you can see below.
pcs constraint shows correct Promoted and cib shows Master (from older
configuration before system upgrade).
If I remove constraints and add them again they will show Promoted in cibadmin
on most of the systems, but I did have cases when it still was showing Master.
The good thing is that after removing and re-adding constraints we can
reconfigure postgres without failures in constraints but we will have to find a
better way to confirm that.
I do not want to take more of your time on this (unless you are interested in
fixing inconsistency). We will try to hook to the name of the constraint in
cibadmin instead of the role.
Thanks again!
_Vitaly
module-248 ~ # pcs cluster cib | head -n 2
<cib crm_feature_set="3.15.0" validate-with="pacemaker-3.8" epoch="55"
num_updates="23" admin_epoch="1" cib-last-written="Fri Apr 11 18:12:38 2025"
update-origin="module-248" update-client="cibadmin" update-user="root"
have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="1">
<configuration>
module-248 ~ # pcs constraint config | grep -w Promoted
Started resource 'DBSlave' with Promoted resource 'postgres-ms'
Started resource 'DBMaster' with Promoted resource 'postgres-ms'
module-248 ~ # pcs constraint config | grep -w Master
module-248 ~ # cibadmin --query | grep -w Master
<op id="postgres-monitor-interval-5s" interval="5s" name="monitor"
on-fail="restart" role="Master" timeout="300s"/>
<rsc_colocation id="colocation-DBSlave-postgres-ms-Master" rsc="DBSlave"
rsc-role="Started" score="-10000" with-rsc="postgres-ms"
with-rsc-role="Master"/>
<rsc_colocation id="colocation-DBMaster-postgres-ms-Master"
rsc="DBMaster" rsc-role="Started" score="INFINITY" with-rsc="postgres-ms"
with-rsc-role="Master"/>
module-248 ~ # cibadmin --query | grep -w Promoted
> On 04/11/2025 5:28 AM EDT Tomas Jelinek <tojel...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Vitaly,
>
> New role names are supported in CIB schema 3.7. If your CIB hasn't been
> updated to at least that version of the schema, then pcs has no choice other
> than to put the old role names into CIB.
>
> To see your CIB schema version, run 'pcs cluster cib | head' and check the
> value of validate-with attribute of the root xml element.
>
> To update CIB to a newer schema, run 'pcs cluster cib-upgrade'.
>
> Regards,
> Tomas
>
> Dne 10. 04. 25 v 14:31 vitaly napsal(a):
>
> > Hi Tomas.
> > Thank you very much for clarification.
> > The only reason I worry is that the script that I am running is supposed to
> > run on the client systems. After the "fix" where I remove old constraints
> > and create new ones I run another check to confirm that old settings are
> > gone and will not cause any issues after upgrade.
> > If this check comes back with old values I am issuing a warning that
> > configuration "may" need to be updated.
> > Below is condensed list of commands I use to replace the old with new.
> > In any case, if pcs constraints list always shows new values I could use it
> > instead of cibadmin to verify correct values.
> >
> > pcs constraint colocation remove DBMaster postgres-ms
> > pcs constraint colocation remove DBSlave postgres-ms
> > pcs constraint colocation add DBMaster with Promoted postgres-ms INFINITY
> > id=colocation- DBMaster-postgres-ms-Promoted
> > pcs constraint colocation add DBSlave with Promoted postgres-ms "-10000"
> > id=colocation- DBSlave-postgres-ms-Promoted
> > pcs resource op delete postgres-monitor-interval-5s
> > pcs resource op add postgres monitor interval=5s timeout=300s
> > on-fail=restart role=Promoted
> >
> > Thank you very much for your help!
> > _Vitaly
> >
> > > On 04/10/2025 5:17 AM EDT Tomas Jelinek <tojel...@redhat.com>
> > > mailto:tojel...@redhat.com wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Vitaly,
> > >
> > > You don't need to worry much about this.
> > >
> > > When pcs is editing CIB, it prefers using the new role names and
> > > automatically falls back to the old role names based on pacemaker / CIB
> > > schema version. When pcs is printing the configuration, it does a reverse
> > > transformation and prints the new role names even if CIB contains the old
> > > ones.
> > >
> > > Pacemaker 2.1, which pcs 0.11 is compatible with, is capable of handling
> > > both old and new role names.
> > >
> > > If you want to get rid of the old role names, you may replace them in CIB
> > > ('pcs cluster edit') or drop the constraints and recreate them using pcs.
> > > If it fails, you maybe have an old CIB version. You can update that with
> > > 'pcs cluster cib-upgrade'.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tomas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Dne 09. 04. 25 v 20:35 vitaly napsal(a):
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I have dual node clusters with postgres as one of the resources.
> > > > The clusters were upgraded from pcs v 0.10 to pcs v 0.11.
> > > > Pcs V 0.11 eliminated Master role and replaced it with Promoted.
> > > > For clusters that were upgraded I needed to remove old configuration
> > > > for colocation because with old one in place while creating new one
> > > > commit of the configuration was failing due to duplicate constraint.
> > > > Update works fine on all the clusters but on one of them AFTER UPGRADE
> > > > I see different output in “cibadmin --query” and in “pcs constraint
> > > > list”
> > > >
> > > > The constraints in “cibadmin –query” are showing:
> > > > <rsc_colocation rsc="DBSlave" with-rsc="postgres-ms" score="-10000"
> > > > rsc-role="Started" with-rsc-role="Master"
> > > > id="colocation-DBSlave-postgres-ms-Promoted"/>
> > > >
> > > > <rsc_colocation rsc="DBMaster" with-rsc="postgres-ms" score="INFINITY"
> > > > rsc-role="Started" with-rsc-role="Master"
> > > > id="colocation-DBMaster-postgres-ms-Promoted"/>
> > > >
> > > > Same constraints in “pcs constraint list” were showing:
> > > > Colocation Constraints:
> > > > Started resource 'DBSlave' with Promoted resource 'postgres-ms'
> > > > score=-10000
> > > >
> > > > Started resource 'DBMaster' with Promoted resource 'postgres-ms'
> > > > score=INFINITY
> > > >
> > > > On all other systems “cibadmin –query” is in agreement with pcs and
> > > > shows:
> > > > <rsc_colocation rsc="DBSlave" with-rsc="postgres-ms" score="-10000"
> > > > rsc-role="Started" with-rsc-role="Promoted"
> > > > id="colocation-DBSlave-postgres-ms-Promoted"/>
> > > >
> > > > <rsc_colocation rsc="DBMaster" with-rsc="postgres-ms" score="INFINITY"
> > > > rsc-role="Started" with-rsc-role="Promoted"
> > > > id="colocation-DBMaster-postgres-ms-Promoted"/>
> > > >
> > > > So my problem is in with-rsc-role showing “Master” on a single system
> > > > and “Promoted” on all others.
> > > >
> > > > Would appreciate it if anybody could shed some light on the issue.
> > > > Thank you very much!
> > > > _Vitaly
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Manage your subscription:
> > > > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > > >
> > > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Manage your subscription:
> > > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
> > >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
