Steven:
This flow-continuations stuff is so new that too few people have it clear
enough to advise about the correct way to do what you requested.
Currently, flow-continuations is still being defined. No one is trying to
show if someone is bad or good coder. Everybody just try to give a tip
that can help. Nothing more or less. Your idea to go to dev is good.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Steven Cummings dijo:
> No you didn't! I just don't think I explained my intentions well enough
> at first (and the reponse seemed way too obvious at first). No biggy.
> I'll try the dev'ers now. Thanks for the reponses!
>
> /S
> --- Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Steven,
>>
>> Hope I didn't offend your programming sensibilities ;-)
>>
>> I'd recommend asking this on the developer list. There are more people
>> doing this kind of stuff there, so you're more likely to get a decent
>> answer.
>>
>> HTH. Upayavira
>>
>> On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:04:08 -0700 (PDT), "Steven Cummings"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > I'm not *that* bad a coder, I can make recursive calls in code! But
>> I'm wondering how to ensure that a new continuation is created so
>> that I can run a
>> > "sub-" formwizard with it's own continuation and then use the old
>> continuation
>> > id to return from it. While I know how continuations are continued
>> from the
>> > flow examples, I don't know exactly how to break back into an
>> xmlforms continuation with a particular id. It is built up a little
>> more, at a high-level. And I don't immediately have any pipeline
>> that takes a continuation
>> > id like from the flow examples for the form and form-wizard
>> frameworks. That is
>> > my wondering.
>> >
>> > /S
>> > --- Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > Steven,
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Steven Cummings"
>> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > > > Antonio,
>> > > >
>> > > > But how do you make a recursive call within the xmlform
>> functionality?
>> Do
>> > > > you call it within the javascript or from a page to the desired
>> pipeline?
>> > >
>> > > I'm an extreme newbie here, but:
>> > >
>> > > You do it the same as you would with any programming language:
>> > >
>> > > var continueRecursing = true;
>> > >
>> > > function foo() {
>> > > if (continueRecursing) {
>> > > sendPageAndWait(...);
>> > > foo();
>> > > }
>> > > }
>> > >
>> > > Or, if you're using jxforms (flow enabled xmlforms), then you'll
>> use sendForm() instead of sendPageAndWait().
>> > >
>> > > Hope that helps a bit.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > >
>> > > Upayavira
>> > > > --- Antonio Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > > Steven Cummings dijo:
>> > > > > > Hello all,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I've got kind of a hair-brained question here, forgive me if
>> it is
>> not
>> > > > > > completely clear. I'm having a hard time thinking of how to
>> create
>> a
>> > > > > > flow and forms for editing a complex, highly nested, and
>> even recursively defined bean.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Let's say I have a bean class A with property of class B. B
>> also
>> has an
>> > > > > > optional property of type B.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > My best thinking is that when I come to those items in the
>> xmlform,
>> I
>> > > > > > will display a link to another flow, so that a "sub-form" is
>> navigated
>> > > > > > to. Cramming everything into one form is, of course, not a
>> very
>> good
>> > > > > > option. Anyway, the theoretical solution presents me with
>> two
>> problems:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > 1. Could the new form and continuation be passed the old
>> continuation,
>> > > > > > and access objects from the old flow?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I am not sure, but maybe a recursion of the same function
>> would work
>> > > here.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Please comments.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > 2. Could the new flow return to continue the old
>> continuation once
>> it
>> > > > > > was done?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > See above.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I might possibly go as much as two or three continuations
>> deeps.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > If the recursion can work here, the answer is yes. :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Remember that each is pretty much an XMLForm wizard
>> implementation,
>> so
>> > > > > > I'm not writing any other low-level flow code except that to
>> control
>> > > the
>> > > > > > form wizard much like in the xmlform samples.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I haven't looked into woody that much yet, so if I'm missing
>> something
>> > > > > > easier there, let me know. If anybody has any good pointers
>> or
>> general
>> > > > > > suggestions I would appreciate it! Surely someone else has
>> had to
>> deel
>> > > > > > with beans that weren't "skin-deep" and contained further
>> complex
>> > > types.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > TIA
>> > > > > > /S
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > __________________________________
>> > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
>> > > > > > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
>> > > > > > http://sbc.yahoo.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To
>> > > > > > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
>> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > __________________________________
>> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
>> > > > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
>> > > > http://sbc.yahoo.com
>> > > >
>> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
>> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > __________________________________
>> > Do you Yahoo!?
>> > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
>> > http://sbc.yahoo.com
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
