Sorry, but it is a solution too specific to my domain problem. If it were generic enough I already would have made it public.
-------- David -----Mensaje original----- De: Upayavira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: viernes, 08 de agosto de 2003 14:09 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: FOP alternatives On 8 Aug 2003 at 13:54, Carmona Perez, David wrote: > I've discarded that possibility in order to have more control, but for > other cases it can be a good solution. Is it possible to extend the block code to give you the extra control? Then you get to contribute back to Cocoon, and also get other eyes checking and maintaining your code. Regards, Upayavira > -----Mensaje original----- > De: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: viernes, 08 de agosto de 2003 8:50 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: FOP alternatives > > Le Vendredi, 8 ao� 2003, � 08:35 Europe/Zurich, Carmona Perez, David a > �crit : > > > ... I've written a custom Cocoon serializer that uses iText.... > > how about using the existing itext block? > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
