on Mon, 1 Sep 2003 17:43:14 +0200 Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...But this looks to me like a workaround ;-), any plans to enhance > > the aggregate > > feature? > > I think the current way of doing aggregation makes perfect sense if > you think of aggregating pipelines, not only generators. > AFAIK there are no plans to change this. And I thing aggregator should be able to take anything that produces SAX events - generators/resources/whatever, so people didn't have to use pipeline-for-generator workaround. Regards, Rufio -- nmap -sS -O -p80,81 www.microsoft.com [..] Running: Linux 2.5.X OS details: Linux Kernel 2.4.18 - 2.5.70 (X86) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
