Bruno Dumon dijo: > On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 11:47, Antonio Gallardo wrote: >> Bruno Dumon dijo: >> > However, for what you are trying to do here, I'd suggest using the >> "range" validation rule. >> >> Hi Bruno: >> >> Carlos and I work together. > > I suspected something like this ;-) > > Welcome on board, Carlos! > >> This is his first post to the list, but he is >> working with Cocoon 3 or 4 months. We are aware that range is better >> for that purpose, but this is just a test. > > Yes of course, I also wanted to know what's wrong. > >> Carlos helps me in the integer >> datatype I posted yesterday. >> >> Interesting enough is that the assert validator in woody is not >> working for us. I think maybe it is broken. > > Now that I think of it, this probably has to do with Sylvain's change of > doing the validation as part of the getValue() call, which is also done > in the validation rule itself to retrieve the value of the widget, so > it's going to do that recursively and finally give a StackOverflowError. > The same can also occur if two different widgets reference each other in > their validation rules. We'll have to see what to do about this, but I > don't have time right now to think about it.
yep. StackOverflow is the error in the sample of registration form of woody block demo. The error show the recursion you said! Well, maybe you can do "tele-programming" (or e-programming) like before, just send us some tips and we will be glad to fix the bug ;) BTW, Cocoon 2.1.2 has the bug inside! opss! :-( I hope Carsten will not be angered if we request for 2.1.3 :-D Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
