Bruno Dumon wrote:

Oops, forgot one aspect here: the caches and buffers aren't created of
the correct size from the first time (because it is unknown on
beforehand). Rather it starts small, lets say at 10k, and when that
buffer is full, a new one of 20k is created and the first 10k is copied
into it, then when the 20k is full one of 40k is created, and so on...
after a while it will reach e.g. 40MB and create one of 80MB, copying
the first 40MB into it, and thus needing 120MB of memory temporarely to
holds those two buffers...



to be honest, I did not really understand the second email, but thank you anyway, I will try out your recommendation soon!


Alex



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to