Hmmm, I was under the impression that WebDAV was full steam ahead, being adoped widely and so on. It was a big part of the "vision" presented during the afternoon of the "GentTogether". And now I hear "WebDAV is dead"?.
Anyone care to unpack that statement??? I will be spending the rest of the day seeing whats in Slide, am I wasting my time? I see webdav as allowing best of breed editors to modify documents outside of the "CMS", and that a CMS may not need to have much (any?) editing capibility if it is webdav enabled. Also I see it as a way to capture metatdata and provide "virtual access structues" for a repository (organize the cds the way u like, when u log in u see your structure, but of the same cds) Also, Does any one know where there are any other open WebDAV java server implementations i shold look at? (besides the tomcat servlet and the Dav4J)? Cheers, -Dave ???????? >Robert Simmons wrote: >My vision is of an architecture that is extensible, powerful, efficient and >based upon commonly used standards. (Lets face it, WebDAV is all but dead) ????????? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
