How
did you go looking at why the cocoon.sh script is not running. Please
confirm that the commands referenced from the cocoon.sh script are indeed in
your path.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Blumer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 1:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: hello everyoneI sent this as an attachment a while ago. Maybe I shouldn't have sent it that way. Are attachments cool, if small?
Last login: Thu Oct 23 11:46:18 on ttyp1Welcome to Darwin![jb:~] johnblumer% cd /Users/johnblumer/cocoon-2.1.2[jb:~/cocoon-2.1.2] johnblumer% ls -altotal 424drwxrwxr-x 25 johnblum staff 850 Oct 23 11:22 .drwxrwxr-x 59 johnblum staff 2006 Oct 23 11:41 ..-rwxrwxr-x 1 johnblum staff 12292 Oct 23 11:22 .DS_Store-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 3533 Oct 1 05:07 CREDITS.txt-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 70 Oct 1 05:07 DESKTOP.INI-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 4369 Oct 1 05:07 INSTALL.txt-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 3923 Oct 1 05:07 KEYS-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 2710 Oct 1 05:07 README.txt-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 3224 Oct 1 05:07 blocks.propertiesdrwxrwxr-x 5 johnblum staff 170 Oct 23 11:19 build-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 2328 Oct 1 05:07 build.bat-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 4243 Oct 1 05:07 build.properties-rwxrwxr-x 1 johnblum staff 470 Oct 1 05:07 build.sh-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 3815 Oct 1 05:07 build.xml-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 9507 Oct 1 05:07 cli.xconf-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 5983 Oct 1 05:07 cocoon.bat-rwxrwxr-x 1 johnblum staff 4449 Oct 1 05:07 cocoon.sh-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 3524 Oct 1 05:07 forrest.properties-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 32359 Oct 1 05:07 gump.xmldrwxrwxr-x 55 johnblum staff 1870 Oct 1 05:07 legaldrwxrwxr-x 8 johnblum staff 272 Oct 23 11:23 lib-rw-r--r-- 1 johnblum staff 3224 Oct 23 09:10 local.blocks.propertiesdrwxrwxr-x 14 johnblum staff 476 Oct 22 17:14 src-rw-rw-r-- 1 johnblum staff 77935 Oct 1 05:07 status.xmldrwxrwxr-x 10 johnblum staff 340 Oct 23 11:22 tools[jb:~/cocoon-2.1.2] johnblumer%On Thursday, Oct 23, 2003, at 11:38 America/Chicago, McDonald, Bruce wrote:
Yes,
