On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 22:24, joern turner wrote:
> Oleg Dulin wrote:
<snip/>
> > The remainder is tricky. I accomplished this by setting up an internal 
> > pipeline that uses RequestGenerator to create an XSL transform called 
> > "update.xsl" that applies the changes to the original document. To know 
> > which form values go to which places in the original document I used 
> > xpaths of the original elements and attributes as names for input 
> > fields. So, an XSL can be generated that applies the changes to the 
> > original doc and wraps it in something that SOurceWritingTransformer can 
> > understand.
> Chiba has a similar concept but without exposing xpathes of the instance 
> (for security reasons). it uses a mapping between xpathes and internally 
> generated ids.

You're pointing out two things here already people might not like about
Chiba:
- it assumes stateful operation (most of Woody also works stateless,
thus without keeping any state on the server, which can be useful in
some cases).
- it uses meaningless id's as request parameter names

-- 
Bruno Dumon                             http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                          [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to