Olivier Billard Escribio :-)
> Hi all !
>
> I have a problem concerning the binding in woody :
>
> I have repeater bound with following structure :
> <person id="">
> <person_id>156</person_id>
> <person_data>some data</person_data>
> </person>
> <person id="">
> <person_id>157</person_id>
> <person_data>other data</person_data>
> </person>
> ...
try this organitation :
<persons>
<person id="156">
...
</person>
...
</persons>
regards,
carlos chavez.
>
> here is the repeater binding :
> <wb:repeater id="persons" parent-path="." row-path="person"
> unique-row-id="id" unique-path="@id">
> <wb:on-bind>
> <wb:value id="person_id" path="person_id" />
remove the line above
> <wb:value id="person_data" path="person_data" />
> </wb:on-bind>
>
> <wb:on-delete-row>
> <wb:delete-node />
> </wb:on-delete-row>
>
> <wb:on-insert-row>
> <wb:insert-node>
> <person id="">
> <person_id />
> <person_data />
> </person>
> </wb:insert-node>
> </wb:on-insert-row>
> </wb:repeater>
>
>
> and the container :
>
> <wd:repeater id="persons">
> <wd:output id="id">
> <wd:datatype base="string"/>
> </wd:output>
> <wd:field id="person_id">
> <wd:label>ID</wd:label>
> <wd:datatype base="string"/>
> </wd:field>
> <wd:field id="person_data">
> <wd:datatype base="string"/>
> </wd:field>
> </wd:repeater>
>
>
> Obviously, @id and person_id play the same role, but this is the only
> way I get it work. When I set :
>
> >>row-path="person_id" unique-row-id="person_id"<<
> on the repeater binding, the last row added is equals to the same...
>
> and when I bind the widget person_id to @id :
> >>
> <wb:on-bind>
> <wb:value id="person_id" path="@id" />
> <wb:value id="person_data" path="person_data" />
> </wb:on-bind>
> <<
> I have a JXPath exception, telling that the value cannot be bound with
> @id...
>
> What is wrong ?
> - is "@id" a wrong JXPath expression ? If yes, how can I bound the
> person_id widget with
> the person/@id in the structure ?
> - are the attrs of the repeater binding >>row-path="person_id"
> unique-row-id="person_id"<< wrong ? In this case, what is the true
> syntax ?
>
> Thanks in advance, and more if you read this mail until the end :) ...
>
> --
> Olivier BILLARD
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Carlos Ch�vez
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]