Cocoon out-of-the-box is a wonderful showcase for all the great things it
can do. However, once you're done admiring all the neat features it has, you
really want to build your /own/ Cocoon.

Preferably, you'll do this as an additive process, rather than a subtractive
one. Firstly, because it's more likely to produce a smaller production
system and secondly because Microsoft has given us all numerous object
lessons in what can happen when everyhing's turned on by default. Not to
suggest that the cocoon samples are inherently unsafe, but few complex
systems are completely safe, especially in subsystems that no one's watching
because they aren't part of the "important" part.

I think that the blocks showcase page was a great idea. It does a decent job
of summarizing what the presupplied features of Cocoon are. I'd even go so
far as to say that one way of making customization easier would be to put
checkboxes on that page so that people could preview facilities, then
uncheck the boxes for blocks their production system isn't going to need.
Then that list could be gathered up to make the new build profile. Adding,
of course, external block definitions for third-party and in-house supplied
extensions.

  Tim Holloway

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolas Toper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Compilation of Cocoon / Binary Distribution / Different
> Configurations,
> 
> 
> Yes you're right, I meant something more easier to use but on 
> the Website
> and adding new processes (but automatic).
> 
> On the broadening base, let's look at PHP vs EJB (I know this 
> is stupid :=))
> 
> EJB doesn't have so many users as PHP but it doesn't matters 
> b/c EJB are
> used in specific context...
> 
> Some core Cocoon's concept could be used not only for XML 
> publishing but for
> all kind of websites.
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Alexander Schatten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoye : vendredi 7 novembre 2003 15:34
> A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: Compilation of Cocoon / Binary Distribution / Different
> Configurations,
> 
> 
> Nicolas Toper wrote:
> 
> >Yes, but we would need to rethink the Cocoon build/releases cycles to
> >simplify the installation...
> >
> >
> no, I do not see why; As an expert one could rather easily 
> provide such
> an binary installation package. no problem at all I see.
> 
> >But we first need to know if we want to broaden the user base or the
> >situation is fine (cocoon is seen as a powerful but 
> difficult product)
> >
> >
> yes, *this* is an important consideration; I have no clear 
> answer yet. I
> would suggest, that we should try to broaden the perspective.
> 
> you might not forget, that Cocoon is for many purposes not much more
> complex then e.g. PHP. If you want to do XML publishing and you would
> have the simple installation as described it is not so complex:
> 
> with things like Automounting of subsitemaps (great feature) 
> and the like.
> 
> you only should remove the complexity from the installation and mark
> *much, much clearer* what is ready for prime-time and what is 
> experimental.
> 
> I often hear complaints like: Cocoon is nice, but I do not 
> know where to
> start when I want to solve problem X; there is solution A, B 
> and C, ...
> 
> like: a dozen of form frameworks; database actions, SQL transformer,
> XSP, logicsheets, ...
> 
> and no "best practice" document that is problem oriented...
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

  This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If you are 
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the 
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error, and that 
any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly 
prohibited.

 If you received this e-mail in error, please return the e-mail to the sender and 
delete it from your computer. Although our company attempts to sweep e-mail and 
attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that either are virus-free and accepts 
no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to