Joerg Heinicke dijo: > On 22.11.2003 09:32, Danny Bols wrote: > >>>PS: in the future, it would be helpful if you could post a diff instead >>>of a complete file, especially if the change is small. Don't know if >>>you're familiar with CVS or other version control systems, but the small >>>learning curve is definitely worth it. >> >> >> Do you mean a kornshell diff? >> Is WinCvs 1.2 on my XP a reliable client? I ran into an error a few >> times >> getting the latest version. What do you used as cvs client? > > cvs diff -u path/file > file.diff > > Yes, WinCVS is indeed reliable and works like a charm for me. I use > 1.3b13 at the moment.
Between lines I see a problem: We are suggesting to use WinCVS 1.2 while WinCvs has evoluted to newer versions. People tend to get the same version as suggested in the HTML pages he saw to avoid problems. It is natural. So I propose to avoid using versions or even better just setting a "minimal" version for tools that are not so important for cocoon development. In this case it does not matter what CVS client you use. In this case it really does not matter if you use winCVS 1.2 or 1.3b3. I hope I explained the point. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
