On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 15:32, Jorg Heymans wrote: > Say i define a custom transform like this > > <map:transformer name="mytransformer" > src="mytransformer" > pool-max="200" > pool-min="20" > pool-grow="10"/> > > In order for these pool settings to take effect, do I need to implement > the poolable marker interface then or does this happen by default? If you want that the component manager to treat your component as a poolable one, it must be marked as poolable and the component manager will do all the work for you! Since your transformer is probably an extension to AbstractTransformer wich is already marked as poolable, you don't have to do anything.
> Can anyone comment on the performance of using pooled components vs > non-pooled? > > > Jorg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Rui Alberto L. GonÃalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PT InovaÃÃo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
